General Solution To Three Simultaneous Equations

DavidZuccaro
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I herewith submit for reference, review and comment the general solution to 3 simultaneous equations as follows:

sim1.png

sim2.png

sim3.png
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Lot of work plus a lot of typesetting !
I do notice that you have written down a general solution for a not so general set of three equations in three unknowns.
Are you familiar with things like inverting a 3x3 matrix? Your matrix has zeros on the diagonal.
 
  • Like
Likes DavidZuccaro
BvU said:
Lot of work plus a lot of typesetting !
I do notice that you have written down a general solution for a not so general set of three equations in three unknowns.
Are you familiar with things like inverting a 3x3 matrix? Your matrix has zeros on the diagonal.

I agree, it's a general solution to a specific set of equations :)

Thanks, I thought that there was a simpler way of solving those.
 
There are several ways of solving a system of linear equations. The most well-known is the "Gaussian elimination" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_elimination). In the general case, you probably need to do a "pivot swapping" for each column to ensure that you do not divide by zero.
 
The typesetting was not a problem -- all handled by LibreOffice Math. It was easier than writing.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top