General Solutions for a particle in a magnetic field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the motion of a particle in a magnetic field, specifically examining the differential equations derived from the Lorentz force and their implications for the particle's trajectory. Participants explore the relationship between the expected circular motion and the elliptical path observed in the calculations, focusing on the mathematical representation of the motion in the x-y plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Daniel presents a scenario involving a particle with initial velocity components and a magnetic field, leading to differential equations that suggest an elliptical motion rather than circular motion.
  • Some participants propose that the discrepancy might be due to differing scales on the axes used in the plot.
  • Daniel challenges the idea that the motion could be circular, noting that attempts to fit the trajectory to a circular equation do not yield consistent results, as the time-dependent components do not vanish.
  • Another participant argues that the trajectory appears circular when plotted, suggesting that the offsets from initial conditions must be considered in the analysis.
  • Daniel acknowledges a potential misunderstanding regarding the parametric nature of the equations, indicating that this may have contributed to the confusion about the shape of the trajectory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the motion can be accurately described as circular. While some see it as circular with the right considerations, Daniel remains uncertain about the validity of this interpretation based on his calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the mathematical treatment of the trajectory, particularly in how the parametric equations relate to the expected circular motion. The discussion highlights the importance of considering initial conditions and scaling in graphical representations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying classical mechanics, particularly in the context of charged particles in magnetic fields, as well as individuals exploring the mathematical modeling of physical systems.

danielakkerma
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!
I encountered a curious problem while trying to solve the case of a particle with v(v_x0, v_y0, 0), and B(0, 0, Bz); The elucidation of the differential equations obtained through the Lorentz force in this case, should coincide with those obtained through a simplification granted by using the Centripetal force, but here, instead of circular motion I get an unattractive ellipse :(.
Assuming the particle moves only on the x-y plane, and starts at (x0, y0, 0), the Lorentz force yields the following:
<br /> \large<br /> \vec{F} = q(\vec{v}\times\vec{B})<br />
<br /> ma_x(t) = -qv_yB<br />
<br /> ma_y(t) = qv_xB<br />
Which in turn, with these initial conditions leads to:
With v0 = Sqrt(vx0^2+vy0^2);
Alpha derived from: Arctan[vy/vx] = alpha;
<br /> x(t) = x_0+ \frac{v_0(-\sin(\alpha)+\sin(\omega t + \alpha))}{\omega}<br />
<br /> y(t) = y_0+ \frac{v_0(\cos(\alpha)-\cos(\omega t + \alpha))}{\omega}<br />
<br /> \omega = \frac{qB}{m}<br />
Plugging in some random values, leads to the attached image, while we all know that motion in a magnetic field should be accompanied by uniform circular motion;
Where have I gone wrong?
Thanks,
Daniel
P.S
This is not related in anyway, to homework.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
You don't think it might not be caused by the fact that your axes have different scales?
 
Firstly, let me thank you for a very prompt reply!
Yes, I have thought of that, as a matter of fact, but the problem is, that attempting to prove that curve is a circle, i.e, by placing it in (x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=R^2, doesn't produce the desired result. In other words, after expanding the left-hand-side, the time dependent component does not vanish, further suggesting that this is somehow, not a circle.
Anyhow, adjusting the scales does little good :(.
What else could there be?
Thankful as always,
Daniel
 
When I make a plot it looks like a circle to me. And from what I can tell x^2+y^2 = R^2, where R is a constant. You forget that x and y have constant offsets dependent upon x_0, y_0 and \alpha. If you retain the time dependent parts you can easily see that they create a circle.
 
Hi,
Thanks again for your response;
I guess I did overreact, and that it should turn out alright; as for x^2+y^2..., I think the problem lied in my not taking the explicit form of y as a function of x. Thus, the problem resides, in this case, in the function being a parametric one.
Thanks again for all your help!
Couldn't have done it with you!
Beholden,
Bound,
Daniel
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
92
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K