Generating Function for Lagrangian Invariant System

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a generating function for a system described by a Lagrangian that is invariant under a specific transformation. The original poster presents equations related to the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian, and attempts to derive the generating function based on the transformation of coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the generating function using the Poisson bracket and expresses concern over conflicting expressions for the generating function. Some participants question the validity of assumptions made about the form of the Lagrangian, while others suggest considering the relationship between canonical momentum and the transformed coordinates.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between canonical momentum and the transformation, but there is no explicit consensus on the next steps or the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of assuming a specific form for the Lagrangian and the necessary adjustments to the equations involved. There is an acknowledgment of the need to clarify the use of LaTeX notation in the context of the Poisson bracket.

Physgeek64
Messages
245
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


Given a system with a Lagrangian ##L(q,\dot{q})## and Hamiltonian ##H=H(q,p)## and that the Lagrangian is invariant under the transformation ##q \rightarrow q+ K(q) ## find the generating function, G.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


##\delta q = \{ q,G \} = \frac{\partial G}{\partial p} ##
##\delta p = \{ p, G \} = -\frac{\partial G}{\partial q} ##

in this case ##\delta q =K(q)##
Hence
##G= pK + c_1(q) ##
Assuming the Lagrangian is of the form ##L=\frac{1}{2} m q^2 -V(q)##
then ##p=m\dot{q}##
and ##\delta p = m\dot{K} = mK' \dot{q}= pK'##

##\delta p = pK'=-\frac{\partial G}{\partial q} ##
## G= -pK +c_2(p)##

I know this is not right because i have two different expressions that can't be matched, but i can't think of another way to do this.

Many thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Physgeek64 said:
Assuming the Lagrangian is of the form
What makes you think you can assume this?

Edit: Also note that { and } are LaTeX delimiters used for grouping. To actually get the brackets of the Poisson bracket you need to use \{ and \}.
 
Orodruin said:
What makes you think you can assume this?

Edit: Also note that { and } are LaTeX delimiters used for grouping. To actually get the brackets of the Poisson bracket you need to use \{ and \}.
Ahh okay then, so I guess i can't make that assumption. In which case i don't know how to proceed, any tips?

Thank you, i will change them :)
 
Consider how the canonical momentum ##P = \partial L/\partial \dot Q## connected to ##Q = q + K(q)## must change relative to ##p##. This should give you ##\delta p##.
 
Orodruin said:
Consider how the canonical momentum ##P = \partial L/\partial \dot Q## connected to ##Q = q + K(q)## must change relative to ##p##. This should give you ##\delta p##.

## \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{Q}} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} \frac{\partial \dot{q}}{\partial \dot{Q}} =\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} \frac{1}{1+\dot{K}'} = p \frac{1}{1+\dot{K}'} ##

?? is this along the right lines?

Many thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
839
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K