How Does Generator Size Affect Weight at Different Speeds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blturner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generator Speed
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between generator size and weight at varying speeds, specifically when generating 1kW of power. Participants debated whether a generator operating at half the RPM would weigh four times, twice, or approximately 1.66 times more than one operating at a higher speed. It was concluded that while efficiency varies with RPM, the weight increase is not as significant as initially presumed, with practical applications suggesting a 2:1 drive ratio could effectively match speeds without drastically increasing weight.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational torque in generators
  • Basic principles of electrical and mechanical engineering
  • Knowledge of efficiency factors in electric motors
  • Familiarity with drive ratios and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of RPM on generator efficiency and weight
  • Explore the principles of torque in electrical motors
  • Study the design and application of gear and belt drive systems
  • Investigate the cooling limitations in small DC electric motors
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in the design and optimization of generators and electric motors.

blturner
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Over at the Airborne Wind Energy forums we are having a debate about the physics of a generator.

The question was posed that if you could generate 1kw of power in the form of rotational torque at 2 different speeds, one begin half as fast as the other how much more would the generator weigh to convert that slower RPM.

One poster is maintaining that it would weigh 4 times as much.
Another is guessing that it would weigh twice as much.
I guessed that it would weigh about 1.66 times as much.

I believe we are presuming that both the RPMs fall in a range where a gearbox is not needed.

I find myself unable to explain this well enough to convince even myself.

We thought that we should be able to "look it up" but I have been unable to do so. A link would be great.

Brian
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't know much about electrical engines. I work with mechanical, but I assume many of the same principles apply. I've seen logical arguments that it would be a factor of eight. But in practice it is less than that. Sometimes not much less.
 
Yes, like you, I have experience in various applications but not generators specifically. In small DC electric motors the ultimate power is limited by cooling. By changing the winding you can get different RPMs out of the same motor. Even as much as double. You can also adjust the windings until you have the same power output at a different RPM. But there is more to it than that. Efficiency would be better at one RPM vs the other. So to get the efficiency back to where it started the motor would have to get larger at the slower RPM. I am like 90% positive that it would not get 4 or more times larger.
 
In practice I don't see why you would need to change the weight by much. Just use a 2:1 drive ratio (either gears or a belt) to match the speed to whichever generator is lightest.

To get a rough idea of how big the system would be, a car alternator generates about 1kW, and it only needs a cheap toothed belt to handle the power to drive it.
 
It depends on the generator. In an automobile alternator we can just increase the field current at lower RPM. What you have proposed is not really enough information to give a concrete answer.
 
Most likely this can only be answered by an "old timer". I am making measurements on an uA709 op amp (metal can). I would like to calculate the frequency rolloff curves (I can measure them). I assume the compensation is via the miller effect. To do the calculations I would need to know the gain of the transistors and the effective resistance seen at the compensation terminals, not including the values I put there. Anyone know those values?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
10K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K