Generic Form of Hermitian Matrix

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter thatboi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum physics
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
I am reading the following thesis: https://www.kip.uni-heidelberg.de/Veroeffentlichungen/download/6387/pdf-6387.pdf
Specifically, I am confused about equation (2.5), where they give the generic form of the matrix ##\mathcal{M}## due to the Hermiticity of ##\mathcal{H}## and the commutation relation (2.4). I am confused about why the bottom right element is ##\bar{A}##. I'm sure this is related to the commutation relation but I'm confused as to how they enter into the picture. ##\mathcal{H}^{\dagger} = (\mathcal{M}a)^{\dagger}(a^{\dagger})^{\dagger} = a^{\dagger}\mathcal{M}^{\dagger}a## so where do the commutation relations come from or what step did I skip?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, something is missing, because I can take ##N=1## and ##M=\begin{pmatrix} 0&1\\1&2 \end{pmatrix}##, which make ##H=a^\dagger a^\dagger + aa+2aa^\dagger##, which is hermitian.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: thatboi