1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Geodesic on a cone, calculus of variations

  1. Jun 22, 2012 #1
    I have to find the geodesics over a cone. I've used cylindrical coordinates. So, I've defined:

    [tex]x=r \cos\theta[/tex]
    [tex]y=r \sin \theta[/tex]

    Then I've defined the arc lenght:

    So, the arclenght:
    [tex]ds=\int_{r_1}^{r_2}\sqrt { 1+A^2+r^2 \left ( \frac{d\theta}{dr}\right )^2 }dr[/tex]

    And using Euler-Lagrange equation:
    [tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial \theta}=0[/tex]
    [tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot \theta}=-\frac{r^2\frac{d\theta}{dr}}{\sqrt{1+A^2+r^2\left ( \frac{d\theta}{dr}\right )^2}}[/tex]
    [tex]\frac{d}{dr}\frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot \theta}=0 \rightarrow \frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot \theta}=-\frac{r^2\frac{d\theta}{dr}}{\sqrt{1+A^2+r^2\left ( \frac{d\theta}{dr}\right )^2}}=K

    The differential equation which I've arrived is non linear. I don't know if what I've done is fine. I know the problem can also be done using spherical coordinates instead of cylindrical, but I've choossen to do it this way.
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 23, 2012 #2
    Is it separable? I didn't simplify your expression, but it looks like you might have

  4. Jun 23, 2012 #3
    Yes, you're right:
    [tex]r^2\frac{d\theta}{dr}=K \sqrt{ 1+A^2+r^2\left ( \frac{d\theta}{dr}\right )^2 }
    [tex]r^4 \left ( \frac{d\theta}{dr} \right )^2=\gamma \left [ 1+A^2+r^2\left ( \frac{d\theta}{dr}\right )^2 \right ]
    [tex]r^4 \left ( \frac{d\theta}{dr} \right )^2=\gamma \left [ 1+A^2+r^2\left ( \frac{d \theta}{dr}\right )^2 \right ]
    [tex](r^4-r^2\gamma) \left ( \frac{d\theta}{dr} \right )^2=\gamma \left [ 1+A^2 \right ]
    [tex]d\theta=\sqrt{ \frac { \eta }{r^2(r^2-\gamma) }}dr
    eta and gamma are constants.

    Anyway, I wanted to know if what I did was ok. I don't care that much about the integral :P

    Thank you algebrat.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Geodesic on a cone, calculus of variations
  1. Calculus by variations (Replies: 2)

  2. Geodesics on a cone (Replies: 0)

  3. Variational Calculus (Replies: 0)

  4. Calculus of variations (Replies: 3)