Geometric Arguments for Z1-Z2 in Complex Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ed Quanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the geometric interpretation of expressions involving complex numbers, specifically |z1 - z2| as the distance between points z1 and z2 in the complex plane. It is established that the equation |z - 4i| + |z + 4i| = 10 defines an ellipse with foci at (0, 4) and (0, -4), while |z - 1| = |z + i| describes a line through the origin with a slope of -1. The participants emphasize the importance of rigorous geometric arguments over vague explanations, advocating for clear definitions and algebraic representations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation in the complex plane.
  • Familiarity with the geometric definition of an ellipse.
  • Knowledge of the properties of perpendicular bisectors in geometry.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation involving complex numbers.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the geometric properties of ellipses, focusing on their foci and distance definitions.
  • Explore the concept of loci in geometry, particularly in relation to distances from fixed points.
  • Learn about the algebraic representation of geometric shapes in the complex plane.
  • Investigate Mobius transformations and their effects on geometric figures such as circles and lines.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in the geometric interpretation of complex numbers and their applications in advanced mathematics.

Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
I am told that |z1-z2| is the distance between two points z1 and z2 in the complex plane. I have to give a geometric argument that

a) |z-4i| + |z+4i|=10 represents an ellipse whose foci are (0, and positive or negative 4)

b)|z-1|=|z+i| represents the line through the origin whose slope is -1

Now my question is what exactly is a geometric argument, and what is sufficient in showing what I am told to show?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rewrite the given expression using the language where |z1 - z2| is replaced by the words, "the distance between z1 and z2."

a) Compare the statement this generates with the geometrical definition of an ellipse.

b) Recall the locus that is found to be a perpendicular bisector.
 
alternatively use the fact that (rather than hand waving arguments) |z|= sqrt(x**2+y**2) where z=x+iy is a complex number, x,y real.
 
matt grime said:
alternatively use the fact that (rather than hand waving arguments) |z|= sqrt(x**2+y**2) where z=x+iy is a complex number, x,y real.

|z+4i| + |z-4i| = 10 means that the locus of z is the set of points each of whose sum of distances from two fixed points (4i, -4i) is a constant (=10). Is this not just the same as showing that (x,y) satisfy (x/a)^2 + (y/b)^2 = 1. I don't see how it is any less rigorous, and definitely disagree with your description of it as hand waving. tell me where I'm wrong.
 
when you get round to demonstrating that circles and straight lines are sent to circles and straight lines under mobius transformations you'll appreciate the necessity of the algebraic arguments, though i will agree hand waving is too dismissive.
 
From the way the original question was phrased: "give a geometric argument that

a) |z-4i| + |z+4i|=10 represents an ellipse whose foci are (0, and positive or negative 4)"

it's clear (to me, anyway!) that Gokul43201's idea: |z-4i|+ |z+4i|= 10 means that the total distance from z to 4i and -4i is 10: precisely the definition of ellipse, is the intended solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K