Geometric Sequences and Series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating that if log a, log b, and log c are three consecutive terms of an arithmetic sequence, then a, b, and c form a geometric sequence. The context is rooted in properties of logarithms and sequences.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the arithmetic and geometric sequences through the properties of logarithms, questioning how to express the common difference and ratio.
  • Some participants suggest rewriting the sequences and computing the common difference and ratio to establish connections between the terms.
  • There are attempts to derive relationships using the definitions of arithmetic and geometric sequences, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their approaches.
  • Questions arise regarding the implications of exponentiation on the sequences and how to apply logarithmic properties effectively.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations and methods being explored. Some participants have provided insights that may guide others toward understanding the relationships between the sequences, while others express confusion about specific steps or concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion arising from the terminology used, specifically distinguishing between sequences and series. There is also acknowledgment of varying levels of comfort with mathematical concepts among participants.

odolwa99
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Q.: Show that if log a, log b and log c are three consecutive terms of an arithmetic sequence, then a, b and c are in geomtric sequence.

Homework Equations



Un = a + (n - 1)d and Sn = \frac{a(r^n - 1)}{r - 1}

The Attempt at a Solution



Attempt:
Consider arithmetic sequence log 2, log 4, log 8 or log 3, log 9, log 27

The respective values of each sequence is 0.301, 0.602, 0.903 and 0.477, 0.954, 1.431

The difference between the numbers in the first sequence is 0.301 and 0.477 in the second.

Geoetric sequence is a, ar, ar^2. So it follows from the above sequnces that...
a = 2 or 3
ar = 2.2 = 4 or 3.3 = 9
ar^2 = 2.2^2 = 8 or 3.3^2 = 27

Thus a, b and c can be expressed in arithmetic sequence as log values and then as geometric sequences without log.

Answer: From textbook: b^2 = ac \Rightarrow Geometric sequence.

I feel I've adequately proven the point, albeit in a slightly unconventional way. Can someone steer me toward the book's answer, or is my method already satisfactory? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well if loga,logb,logc are the terms then what is d? (equate 'd' for the first two and 'd' for the second two).

What will you get then?
 
write the sequence as: \log a=\alpha +(n-1)d, \log b=\alpha +nd and \log c=\alpha +(n+1)d. You should be able to compute d in two ways, this will give you a relationship between a,b and c. You do the same sort of thing with a,b and c as a geometric series.
 
Hmm. How about taking the recursive definition of a geometric series and taking the log of it. Seems completely trivial.

[Edit: sequence, not series; Note the OP problem statement; that is what I meant].
 
Last edited:
Here's the second shot...

In an arithmetic sequence U2 - U1 = d
Therefore... (log b = a + nd) - (log a = a + nd - d)
b - a = d

In a geometric sequence U2/ U1 = r
Therefore... (log b = \frac{a(r^n - 1)}{r - 1}) / (log a = \frac{a(r^n - 1}{r - 1})

b/ a = \frac{ar^n(r - 1)}{r(ar^n - a)}

b/ a = \frac{ar^n.r - ar^n}{ar^n.r - ar}

b/ a = \frac{1 - ar^n}{1 - ar}

Thats what I have at the moment. The revised arithmetic sequence looks correct but I'm not sure about the geometric sequence. Can someone verify if I'm on track? Thank you.
 
odolwa99 said:
Here's the second shot...

In an arithmetic sequence U2 - U1 = d
Therefore... (log b = a + nd) - (log a = a + nd - d)
b - a = d

If your three terms in AP are loga,logb,logc; using for formula for d then

d = u2-u1= logb-loga.

Shouldn't d also be equal to u3-u2 ?

Similarly for the GP, you are correct in the r = b/a = u2/u1 shouldn't u3/u2 give the same 'r'?
 
odolwa99 said:

Homework Statement



Q.: Show that if log a, log b and log c are three consecutive terms of an arithmetic sequence, then a, b and c are in geomtric sequence.

Homework Equations



Un = a + (n - 1)d and Sn = \frac{a(r^n - 1)}{r - 1}

Note, you have the formula here for an arithmetic sequence and geometric series, not sequence. This is confusing you.
 
Ok, back again...

So, we've already seen that log b - log a = d
now, log c - log b = (a + (n + 1)d) - (a + nd)
c - b = (a + nd + d) - (a + nd)
c - b = d
Thus, we see that the 3 terms of log a, b and c are all in arithmetic sequence.

In geometric 'sequence' we have...
Un = ar^n - 1
so, log a = ar^n - 1, log b = ar^n and log c = ar^n + 1
if r = U2/ U1, then log a/ log b = r
log b/ log a = \frac{ar^n}{ar^n - 1}
b/ a = 1/ -1 = -1

log c/ log b = \frac{ar^n + 1}{ar^n}
c/ b = 1

Am I in the clear? Thanks, in advance.
 
You have as given by the problem statement that:

log b - log a = log c - log b = d (for some d).


What to you get if you take exp() of these expressions?

This is really meant to be trivial.
 
  • #10
log b = d + log a, log c = d + log b = 2d + log a

Therefore, b^2 = ac...?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
odolwa99 said:
log b = d + log a, log c = d + log b = 2d + log a

Therefore, b^2 = ac...?

Yes, just work it out. Just do the exponentiation. I haven't seen you try it yet.
 
  • #12
Ok, so if x = log a, then e^x = a.

Thus, the exponent of log a, log b and log c is a, b and c, so...
b = d + a and c = d + b = 2d + a
Therefore, b^2 = ac...?
 
  • #13
odolwa99 said:
Ok, so if x = log a, then e^x = a.

Thus, the exponent of log a, log b and log c is a, b and c, so...
b = d + a and c = d + b = 2d + a
Therefore, b^2 = ac...?

Do you know the basic laws of exponentiation/logs?

exp(m + j ) = exp(m) * exp (j)

exp(log(m)) = m

exp( m * j) = exp(m)^j = exp(j)^m

(deliberately using funny letters different from the OP).

for example. Let me see you apply exp() to the expressions on both sides of the equalities you wrote in post #10.

What is frustrating here is that actually writing out the full answer for you would be about 1/4 the length of this post. But I want you to do that.
 
  • #14
Unfortunately, maths was always my weakest subject and it's been a lifetime since I last studied it. My best years are behind me and I'm trying to help my grandson with his homework, but it's obviously going to be a lot harder than I imagined.

I genuinely appreciate your assistance and wanted to say as much, as I have always found it hard to express my difficulty in the subject in a classroom environment. I always had fears of attracting negative reactions from the other students or teachers when I struggled with these concepts.

I'm not looking for pity, but I just wanted to explain my position, as I feel maybe you think I'm frustrating you intentionally. For what it's worth, I apologise.
 
  • #15
I apologize to the mentors for this, but in this case I am inclined to write out an answer:

You had written in post #10:

log b = d + log a, log c = d + log b = 2d + log a

Define that d = log r ; that is r = e^d.

Applying exp() to your equations (using the rules I gave in my previous post) then gives:

b= a r ; c = b r; c = a r^2

From which geometric series is obvious; also obvious that b^2 = a^2 r^2 = (a)*(a r^2) = ac.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K