isnainidiah
- 14
- 0
How do you use Fermat's principle of least time to explain various concepts in geometrical optics?
The discussion revolves around the application of Fermat's principle of least time in explaining concepts within geometrical optics, particularly focusing on the laws of reflection and refraction, as well as the design of mirrors and lenses. Participants explore how this principle can be used to derive optical laws and the implications for optical design.
Participants generally agree that Fermat's principle is relevant to the discussion of geometrical optics, particularly in deriving laws and designing optical elements. However, there are competing views on the extent to which geometrical optics encompasses only reflection and refraction, as well as the role of practical purposes in the design of optical systems.
Participants express uncertainty regarding the relationship between Fermat's principle and the specific shapes of lenses and mirrors, as well as the implications of aberration correction. The discussion does not resolve these uncertainties.
You can use Fermat's principle to derive the laws on which geometrical optics is based: The laws of reflection and refraction.isnainidiah said:How do you use Fermat's principle of least time to explain various concepts in geometrical optics?
Yes. That is the basis of geometrical optics.isnainidiah said:So when we talk about optic geometry, we just explain the reflection and refraction, isn't it ??
I don't quite understand the question. Use Fermat to derive the laws of optics, then use those laws to design mirrors and lenses to do what you would like (form images, for example).isnainidiah said:then what if the answer to the question "how do you use Fermat's principle to explain the need for forms of mirrors and lenses"?
Usually, the need for designing certain shapes of the mirrors and lenses is for aberration correction purpose. Aberration comes in various forms, all of them have adverse effect on the formed image, so suppressing them by designing certain shapes and/or material of the mirrors and lenses is demanded.isnainidiah said:Yeah i mean, how we use fermat principle to explain the required shapes of lenses and mirrors ?
So, the design of mirror and lens just for certain purpose, is'n it?blue_leaf77 said:Usually, the need for designing certain shapes of the mirrors and lenses is for aberration correction purpose. Aberration comes in various forms, all of them have adverse effect on the formed image, so suppressing them by designing certain shapes and/or material of the mirrors and lenses is demanded.
Are you asking about correcting for abberations? Or just asking about the basic shapes of lenses and mirrors?isnainidiah said:So, the design of mirror and lens just for certain purpose, is'n it?
Then, we derived the fermat principle that can we use to design the mirror and lens for certain purpose, is'n it
I asking about basic shapes of lenses or mirror and also another shapes of lenses or mirror,Doc Al said:Are you asking about correcting for abberations? Or just asking about the basic shapes of lenses and mirrors?
So, we need the purpose first,blue_leaf77 said:The (practical) purpose for which lenses or mirrors with certain shapes needs to be produced usually comes first, then one applies the theories either through Fermat's principle or merely ray tracing to analyse the optical elements.
It should be that way, you don't normally use your design software to design optics as a plaything as weird as you want (except for learning purpose). There must be a specific purpose for certain optics design.isnainidiah said:So, we need the purpose first,
then we can use many theories to analyse it, isn't it ?
Okay, thak your for the explanationblue_leaf77 said:It should be that way, you don't normally use your design software to design optics as a plaything as weird as you want (except for learning purpose). There must be a specific purpose for certain optics design.