Geometrical Optics: Explaining Concepts with Fermat's Principle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Fermat's principle of least time in explaining concepts within geometrical optics, particularly focusing on the laws of reflection and refraction, as well as the design of mirrors and lenses. Participants explore how this principle can be used to derive optical laws and the implications for optical design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Fermat's principle can be used to derive the laws of reflection and refraction.
  • Others mention that various resources, including web pages and videos, explain how the law of refraction can be derived from Fermat's principle.
  • There is a discussion about whether geometrical optics is limited to reflection and refraction.
  • Some participants inquire about how Fermat's principle can explain the required shapes of lenses and mirrors.
  • One participant notes that the design of mirrors and lenses often aims to correct aberrations, which can adversely affect image quality.
  • Another point raised is that the practical purpose for which lenses or mirrors are designed typically comes first, followed by the application of theories such as Fermat's principle or ray tracing for analysis.
  • There is a question about whether the design process should begin with a specific purpose before applying theoretical frameworks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Fermat's principle is relevant to the discussion of geometrical optics, particularly in deriving laws and designing optical elements. However, there are competing views on the extent to which geometrical optics encompasses only reflection and refraction, as well as the role of practical purposes in the design of optical systems.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the relationship between Fermat's principle and the specific shapes of lenses and mirrors, as well as the implications of aberration correction. The discussion does not resolve these uncertainties.

isnainidiah
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
How do you use Fermat's principle of least time to explain various concepts in geometrical optics?
 
Science news on Phys.org
isnainidiah said:
How do you use Fermat's principle of least time to explain various concepts in geometrical optics?
You can use Fermat's principle to derive the laws on which geometrical optics is based: The laws of reflection and refraction.
 
For example, do a Google search for "law of refraction fermat principle" and you'll find many web pages and even a video which try to explain how the law of refraction can be derived from Fermat's principle. If you don't understand one of those derivations, post a link to it and ask questions about the specific things that you're stuck on.
 
Okay thank you,,

So when we talk about optic geometry, we just explain the reflection and refraction, isn't it ??

then what if the answer to the question "how do you use Fermat's principle to explain the need for forms of mirrors and lenses"?
 
isnainidiah said:
So when we talk about optic geometry, we just explain the reflection and refraction, isn't it ??
Yes. That is the basis of geometrical optics.

isnainidiah said:
then what if the answer to the question "how do you use Fermat's principle to explain the need for forms of mirrors and lenses"?
I don't quite understand the question. Use Fermat to derive the laws of optics, then use those laws to design mirrors and lenses to do what you would like (form images, for example).
 
Yeah i mean, how we use fermat principle to explain the required shapes of lenses and mirrors ?
 
isnainidiah said:
Yeah i mean, how we use fermat principle to explain the required shapes of lenses and mirrors ?
Usually, the need for designing certain shapes of the mirrors and lenses is for aberration correction purpose. Aberration comes in various forms, all of them have adverse effect on the formed image, so suppressing them by designing certain shapes and/or material of the mirrors and lenses is demanded.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Usually, the need for designing certain shapes of the mirrors and lenses is for aberration correction purpose. Aberration comes in various forms, all of them have adverse effect on the formed image, so suppressing them by designing certain shapes and/or material of the mirrors and lenses is demanded.
So, the design of mirror and lens just for certain purpose, is'n it?
Then, we derived the fermat principle that can we use to design the mirror and lens for certain purpose, is'n it
 
isnainidiah said:
So, the design of mirror and lens just for certain purpose, is'n it?
Then, we derived the fermat principle that can we use to design the mirror and lens for certain purpose, is'n it
Are you asking about correcting for abberations? Or just asking about the basic shapes of lenses and mirrors?
 
  • #10
The (practical) purpose for which lenses or mirrors with certain shapes needs to be produced usually comes first, then one applies the theories either through Fermat's principle or merely ray tracing to analyse the optical elements.
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
Are you asking about correcting for abberations? Or just asking about the basic shapes of lenses and mirrors?
I asking about basic shapes of lenses or mirror and also another shapes of lenses or mirror,
 
  • #12
blue_leaf77 said:
The (practical) purpose for which lenses or mirrors with certain shapes needs to be produced usually comes first, then one applies the theories either through Fermat's principle or merely ray tracing to analyse the optical elements.
So, we need the purpose first,
then we can use many theories to analyse it, isn't it ?
 
  • #13
isnainidiah said:
So, we need the purpose first,
then we can use many theories to analyse it, isn't it ?
It should be that way, you don't normally use your design software to design optics as a plaything as weird as you want (except for learning purpose). There must be a specific purpose for certain optics design.
 
  • #14
blue_leaf77 said:
It should be that way, you don't normally use your design software to design optics as a plaything as weird as you want (except for learning purpose). There must be a specific purpose for certain optics design.
Okay, thak your for the explanation
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K