Get A Reference for f(R) Gravity

[thecoop]

hey guys , is there anybody here to give me a nice reference for f(R) gavity ?


Regards


thecoop

 

[Boston_Guy]

hey guys , is there anybody here to give me a nice reference for f(R) gavity ?

What is f(R) gravity?

 

[jtbell]

There's a Wikipedia page about it, for what it's worth. It has references to what appear to be legitimate publications.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F(R)_gravity

It appears to be a serious research area, although probably a bit out of the mainstream. I'd never heard of it, either.

 

[Dickfore]

What is f(R) gravity?

It would be a theory with a modified Hilbert-Einstein action, where the density is not proportiomal to the Ricci scalar R, but to some non-linear function of it.

The modified field equations will contain the Ricci curvature in a non-linear way, and might disallow the possibility of a black hole.

By dimensional analysis, one can construct a dimensionless quantity from c, \hbar, G, and R:
<br /> \frac{G \, R}{\hbar \, c^{3}}<br />
Also, we can construct a combination with the dimension of an action density:
<br /> \left[ \frac{S}{x^4} \right] = \mathrm{T}^{-1} \, \mathrm{L}^{-2} \, \mathrm{M} \stackrel{\mathrm{n.u.}}{\rightarrow} \mathrm{L}^{-4}<br />
Because \left[ G \right] = \mathrm{T}^{-2} \, \mathrm{L}^{3} \, \mathrm{M}^{-1} \stackrel{\mathrm{n.u.}}{\rightarrow} \mathrm{L}^{2}, we ought to have \mathcal{L} \propto G^{-2}. Returning the proper powers of \hbar, and c, we get:
<br /> \mathcal{L} \propto \frac{c^6}{\hbar \, G^2}<br />
Thus, we can write:
<br /> S_{g} = \frac{c^6}{\hbar G^2} \, \int{f\left( \frac{\hbar \, G \, R}{c^3} \right) \, \sqrt{-g} \, d^4 x}<br />

If you require the Planck's constant to drop out of the expression, you ought to have:
<br /> f(x) = A \, x<br />
i.e. the Lagrangian density is proportional to the scalar curvature. This is the ordinary Hilbert-Einstein action. The numerical constant A is fixed by Newton's Law of universal Gravitation.

We might be tempted to choose a different functional form. For example, let us see if we can get G, the Universal Gravitational constant, to drop out from the expression. In a sense, this would make the action purely quantum effect. It is easy to see that this happens if:
<br /> f_{2} = B \, x^2<br />
A quadratic function dominates a linear function for large values of the argument, i.e. for:
<br /> R \gg \frac{A}{B} \, L^{-2}_{P}<br />
where L_{P} = \sqrt{G \, \hbar/c^{3}} \sim 10^{-35} \, \mathrm{m} is the Planck length.

There is, however, a problem with choosing a non-linear function. Namely, R contains second derivatives of the metric tensor, but as a 4-gradient. Therefore, they get integrated out when the function is linear. But, one cannot do the same for a nonlinear function, and the equations that we would get would contain derivatives higher than two of the metric tensor.