Getting Started in Astrophysics Without Math Knowledge

  • Thread starter Thread starter NerfMonkey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
To get started in astrophysics at sixteen with limited math knowledge, self-study is a viable option. It is recommended to learn foundational math concepts, such as trigonometry and calculus, through accessible textbooks. Special relativity can be understood with basic math, specifically the Pythagorean theorem, making it a good starting point. Suggested resources include older editions of "Spacetime Physics" and "It's About Time" by N. David Mermin, which can help bridge the gap in understanding. Additionally, engaging with popular science literature can provide context and terminology relevant to physics. Staying updated with current astrophysics research through news articles can also enhance understanding without requiring advanced math skills.
NerfMonkey
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
I generally try to avoid posting threads like this but this isn't exactly something one can Google. How, at sixteen and with very little math knowledge, can I get started in astrophysics? I read about physics and have a grasp on some concepts but I don't know anything about the math involved and can't even begin to understand it having only algebra one knowledge and very limited geometry knowledge.

I don't know where to begin and the thought of having to wait another two years to take the classes required to understand the math behind astrophysics kills me. I apologize if this is too vague of a question but I don't really know where else to go.

And I did read the "So you want to be a physicist" page, but pretty much all I got out of it was to make sure I have a handle on all of my high school math classes. Call me impatient but basically what I'm asking is if there is any way for me to get started a little early.

Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could always try to learn the math on your own. There are plenty of textbooks out there. Find one that works for you and work through it. If you're studious you can learn a lot of math relatively fast this way.
 
NerfMonkey said:
I generally try to avoid posting threads like this but this isn't exactly something one can Google. How, at sixteen and with very little math knowledge, can I get started in astrophysics?

You could learn about special relativity. Much of special relativity can be learned using nothing more mathematically sophisticated than the Pythagorean theorem.

I recommend two books:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0070430276/?tag=pfamazon01-20;
https://www.amazon.com/dp/071670336X/?tag=pfamazon01-20.

I purposely gave a link to an old edition of Spacetime Physics, as this is the edition that most physicists prefer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You could probably teach yourself enough trig and calculus in several months to understand a significant part of a text like Resnick & Halliday or the Feynman Lectures. It wouldn't hurt to get those out of the library to see what kind of unfamiliar math they have in them.

Pop-sci books (Gamow, Asimov, etc) are useful for getting a feel for terminology, history, and the "culture" of Physics. See the book review section for more ideas.

George's suggestion is a good one as you don't need any more math than you already have to understand special relativity completely. I'd add the book It's About Time by N. David Mermin to his list.

And you can learn a lot of physics from working the problems in Spacetime Physics (the red paperback, not the newer one). You'll need some trig for that one, though.
 
NerfMonkey said:
How, at sixteen and with very little math knowledge, can I get started in astrophysics?

I agree with the advice others gave about teaching yourself.

Often overlooked but also important: Keep up with the news. Reports and articles (written for laypeople as well as for the scientific community) give you a good idea of what research is going on right now, what the most recent discoveries are, and what the next telescopes/observatories will look for. No advanced math is required.
 
Thanks a lot for all the help, I really appreciate it.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
970
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
71
Views
725
Replies
18
Views
665
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top