Getting the particular solution of this differential equation.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a particular solution to the differential equation y'' - 2y' - 3y = -3t*e^(-t) using the method of undetermined coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find a particular solution and discusses their guess for Yp, noting difficulties in determining coefficients. Some participants suggest modifying the initial guess due to overlaps with the homogeneous solution.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different approaches to formulating the particular solution, with some guidance provided on adjusting the guess based on the homogeneous solution. The original poster indicates a successful resolution but reflects on the process of equating coefficients.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions constraints related to solving for multiple variables and references external resources for clarification on the method used.

FocusedWolf
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



y''-2y'-3y=-3t*e^(-t)

Homework Equations



Has to be done with method of undetermined coefficients

The Attempt at a Solution



the chacteristic equation is: c1*e^(3t) + c2*e^(-t)

my attempt at Yp is (a*t+b)*e^(-t)... so you that's not it. i tried many versions and i keep on getting a = 3t/4.

the book has the answer as y=c1*e^(3t) + c2*e^(-t)+(3/16)*t*e^(-t)+(3/8)*t^2*e^(-t)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your homogeneous equation has a solution that is of the form of one of your terms in the particular solution. I suggest a similar guess, with a tweak.
 
Since e3t is already a solution to the homogeneous equation, you need to multiply your first "guess" by t.
 
thx i successfully got the answer. At first i tried to get that to work, but then it came to the part where you got to solve for like 3 variables, like a, b, and t... and while glancing over to my calculus book, which has a better writup on differential equation then my differential equation book lol, i saw how you had to deal with this by equating the coeffecients. i don't remember this problem i posted about but it was like you had to separate it where t(a + b) + (a - b) = 3t. and did a + b = 3, and a - b = 0, and solve for a and b that way. it's interesting that that even works cause my ti89 can't do it, which is shocking lol
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K