Giant slalom of particles in a plasma?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sven Andersson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Plasma
Sven Andersson
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
The charged particles of a plasma are either strongly repelled or attracted to one another. Am I correct in saying that they do a "giant slalom" around one another? And does this mean that the transfer of momentum in a collision is much smaller than in a neutral gas where the atoms/molecules collide like billiard balls? Where can I read up on this?

S.A.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure what you mean by doing a giant slolam around one another. But you are correct in that even small charge imbalances create large electric fields. If you go on to learn some plasma physics, you will learn the so-called 'plasma approximation' (not valid for high frequency/small scale phenomena) that exploits this fact to simplify the analysis by initially assuming the electron and ion densities are equal.

I am fairly ignorant of collisions in plasmas. Back when I was in that field I was mostly studying phenomena in the Earth's magnetosphere, where a typical mean free path is the order of an astronomical unit so collisions could be safely neglected. Very good plasmas tend to have few large-angle collisions but many small angle collisions. One place to start reading up on collisions is in the lecture notes at:
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/nuclear-engineering/22-611j-introduction-to-plasma-physics-i-fall-2003/
or
https://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/plasma/Plasma/
some notes on collsions are also in the lecture notes of
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/nuclear-engineering/22-616-plasma-transport-theory-fall-2003/

jason
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top