Given a box contain 50m3 of gases, how fast should I pump gases into?

  • Thread starter Thread starter td21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Gases Pump
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the minimum rate at which gases should be pumped into a house with a volume of 50m³ to ensure that the gas inside is completely replaced within one hour. The context includes considerations of gas mixing and the dynamics of ventilation systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the pumping rate, with initial attempts suggesting a straightforward division of volume by time. However, there is skepticism about the simplicity of this approach, leading to considerations of gas mixing and the potential need for a higher rate to ensure complete replacement.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some suggest that the question may be misleading or overly simplistic, while others propose that assumptions about gas behavior and mixing need to be clarified. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for gas molecules to remain in the system despite pumping new gas in, raising questions about the assumptions made regarding gas behavior and mixing efficiency. The nature of the ventilation system and external conditions are also considered relevant factors.

td21
Gold Member
Messages
177
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



Given a house(with ventilation system) contains 50m3 of gases, what is minimum rate should I pump gases into the box so that the box contains completely new gas from outside in an hour? (Challenge question)

Homework Equations



rate = volume/time

statistical mechanics
fluid dynamics

The Attempt at a Solution



50m3/60min = 5/6 m3/min?
I do not believe the question being that simple I think some old gases will remain inside. Also, should the the answer be 10/6 m3/min (the double)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, could well be they try to trick you. Context decides here if it's really that simple or whether you should pump at infinite rate (and even then: some gas molecules might make it from the exhaust to the pump inlet ! -- this is not unrealistic: last week we had to evacuate our building because pentadiene was nicely sent outside by the exhaust system, but weather conditions made it return to the 'fesh air' inlet faster than anybody had ever foreseen!)

Taking the double isn't so smart: arbitrary. Either 5/6 or infinity (but then you get blown out too, probably, so maybe 5/6 is the better gamble) !

Not very physics, this exercise...
 
BvU said:
Yeah, could well be they try to trick you. Context decides here if it's really that simple or whether you should pump at infinite rate (and even then: some gas molecules might make it from the exhaust to the pump inlet ! -- this is not unrealistic: last week we had to evacuate our building because pentadiene was nicely sent outside by the exhaust system, but weather conditions made it return to the 'fesh air' inlet faster than anybody had ever foreseen!)

Taking the double isn't so smart: arbitrary. Either 5/6 or infinity (but then you get blown out too, probably, so maybe 5/6 is the better gamble) !

Not very physics, this exercise...

Thank you for the response. What if no gas molecules might make it from the exhaust to the pump inlet? This should be a pretty good assumption.The reason for me to consider double is that the gas pumped in will repel the gas originally inside out of the house through the ventilation, but on the other hand the gas pumped in may get repelled by other gases pumped in as well. Therefore, the probability of the new gas pumped into remain in house or be expelled from house is 1/2 (or not?) in the overall process. Therefore to fill the house with completely new gases, the rate should be double to do this in a certain amount of time (an hour). Is this a good "approximation"?
 
I agree with you. Whatever one pumps in gets mixed with what's already inside. Type of mixing is then also part of the discussion. But I still think the simplest answer is what's intended here, or else they would have given some criterion by which to choose: double, e times, or 99% refreshed, or whatever.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K