Given RLC circuit to find V over load & other complications

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a homework problem related to an RLC circuit, specifically focusing on finding the voltage across the load and addressing complications arising from mixing time domain and frequency domain representations. The scope includes theoretical aspects of electrical engineering, particularly phasors and impedances in circuit analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using phasors and impedances, emphasizing the need to avoid mixing different domains in node equations.
  • Another participant raises a concern about the given current being in the time domain while impedances are in the frequency domain, seeking clarification on how to reconcile this.
  • A participant explains that the current's frequency can be extracted from its cosine function to determine the corresponding phasor.
  • One contributor warns against mixing Laplace domain and time domain quantities, suggesting a focus on steady state response rather than transient analysis.
  • Participants discuss the importance of representing the current as a phasor and calculating the impedances of the reactive components based on the operating frequency.
  • There is a correction regarding the calculation of voltage, with one participant indicating an error in the previous computations and providing guidance on finding the complex form of the phasor voltage.
  • Another participant confirms the corrected value for voltage and discusses converting it to polar form and back to the time domain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to handle the transition between time domain and frequency domain, indicating that multiple approaches are being considered. There is no consensus on a single method, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best way to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their approaches, such as the potential confusion between different domains and the need for careful handling of phasor representations. There are unresolved mathematical steps related to voltage calculations and the implications of using peak versus rms values.

hdp12
Messages
67
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


In my Intro to EE class we have a homework assignment with the following problem:

ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1447880839.699240.jpg


I think I finished part a but want to make sure that I am doing the problem correctly before I move on to the next part.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1447880822.202961.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll want to work with phasors and impedances; You can't mix Ohms and Henries and Farads in your node equations. So first thing to do is determine the impedances of your reactive components (L and C). These will be imaginary values, in Ohms. Then use these in your node equations.
 
but the given current is in terms of t and impedances are in terms of s or jω
what do I do about that?
 
hdp12 said:
but the given current is in terms of t and impedances are in terms of s or jω
what do I do about that?
The current is specified as a cosine function of time. It has a frequency, so there's your ω for determining impedances. Its phasor will be just the magnitude of the cosine function since there's no phase shift involved.
 
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1447887888.981216.jpg


Yeah?
 
No, for a couple of reasons. First, you're mixing Laplace domain and time domain quantities in the same equations (the cosine as a function of time along with 's' implied differentiation and integration in the Laplace domain). That's not going to work, and it's really too much mathematical machinery for the problem at hand: you aren't looking for transient and steady state response of the circuit, you're looking for just the steady state response, which is much simpler!

o Start by determining the operating frequency of the circuit: pull ω out of the time domain definition of the source.
o Write the current as a phasor value: For a cosine it's just the magnitude, so it's really simple.
o Use the ω from above and determine the impedances of the reactive components (jω stuff). Write them onto the circuit diagram.
o Write the node equations (or whatever other method you choose to solve for the required values).
 
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1447889179.292806.jpg


What do I do with that i(t)? I think I'm supposed to know based on the phasor but I'm unsure
 
Okay, you're getting there. Replace i(t) on your figure with the phasor current 20 A. Keep in mind that this represents the peak value, not the rms value. Later you'll be asked to find rms values and powers dissipated, so you'll need to remember this. You'll see :smile:

Calculate values for the impedances of L and C. You've got the frequency and the component values, so do the calculations. Write those values onto your diagram.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1447890656.771047.jpg


Now what?
 
  • #10
Hmm. Something's gone awry in your workings. Your value for V2 doesn't look right. I think you've done fine up to where you've found an expression for VA in terms of V2.

When you've sorted that, the value for V2 will be the complex form of the phasor voltage for V2. You can find its magnitude and phase from the complex value.
 
  • #11
I found where I made the error, it was when I plugged in Va in terms of V2 into (1), so after solving it (correctly this time I think) I got

61.54j-61.54

does that look right?
 
  • #12
hdp12 said:
I found where I made the error, it was when I plugged in Va in terms of V2 into (1), so after solving it (correctly this time I think) I got

61.54j-61.54

does that look right?
Yes, that looks much better!

So now you have the phasor for V2 in complex form. You can convert it to polar form: magnitude and phase, then write the time domain version from that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K