Given voltage, solve for unknown resistor in a circuit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the resistance of an unknown circuit element (R2) in a series circuit with a known resistor (R1 = 3.5 kΩ) and a battery voltage (V0 = 8.0 V). The voltage across R1 is measured at 5.0 V, leading to a calculated current of 0.0014 A. Two solutions were proposed: Solution 1 yields R2 = 2.21 kΩ, while Solution 2 gives R2 = 2.14 kΩ. Both solutions are valid, with discrepancies arising from rounding and truncation errors in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law (V=IR)
  • Basic knowledge of series circuits
  • Ability to perform calculations with significant figures
  • Familiarity with scientific notation for precision
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of series circuits and voltage division
  • Practice calculations involving Ohm's Law with varying resistances
  • Learn about error analysis in electrical measurements
  • Explore the use of scientific notation in engineering calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, circuit designers, and anyone involved in practical applications of Ohm's Law and circuit analysis.

acdurbin953
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An ohmic resistor (R1 = 3.5 kΩ) and circuit element X are connected in series to a battery of unknown voltage V0. Circuit element X is of unknown resistance. It is observed that the absolute value of the voltage across resistor R1 is 5.0 V.
The battery voltage is measured and found to be equal to 8.0 V.
The resistance of X must be what?

Homework Equations


V=IR
Found the current to be 0.0014 amps by doing 5.0 V/3500 kΩ

The Attempt at a Solution


My trouble is that I have worked the problem, but have come up with 2 similar solutions that seem plausible.

Solution 1: 8V = 0.0014(R1+R2), solving for R2 gives 2.21kΩ
Solution 2: Since the total voltage is 8 and R1 is 5, R2 must be 3. So then 3V = 0.0014(R2), and solving for R2 gives 2.14kΩ.

Both attempts are so close together that I have no idea which is right! Are they both more or less correct and one is just more accurate than the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both methods will give you the correct (same) answer if you pay attention to rounding and truncation issues.

Don't round intermediate values for calculation. Carry sufficient digits to ensure that rounding and truncation errors do not creep into your valid significant digits. Scientific notation can go a long way to help avoid tired calculator fingers from entering all those leading zeros :)
 
Thanks! I guess I shouldn't be so lazy. ha
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K