Gluon Colour Shift: Research Project Idea

silicool
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I had a thought the other day - following from general relativity, a photon experiences a gravitational red shift in frequency. Searching for a research project, I toyed with the idea of a chromodynamic red shift if a photon were to pass through a strong field. However, since the photon has no color charge, i could not see any kind of a shift occurring. Here is the question i pose: could a gluon undergo an analgous "colour shift" within a hadron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "colo(u)rs" in reference to gluons and quarks are merely labels. They have nothing to do with color for light. They could just as well be called cat, dog, and pig.
 
Red shift involves a change in frequency of light. I'm not aware of a weak force or strong force analog to frequency.
 
silicool said:
I had a thought the other day - following from general relativity, a photon experiences a gravitational red shift in frequency. Searching for a research project, I toyed with the idea of a chromodynamic red shift if a photon were to pass through a strong field. However, since the photon has no color charge, i could not see any kind of a shift occurring. Here is the question i pose: could a gluon undergo an analgous "colour shift" within a hadron?

Er no, the gluon's colour is not an actual colour, it is a quantumnumber that arises because of certain symmetry relations under which the physics of the strong force must be invariant. This is just like how the L-operator (J, more generally) arises because of invariance of wavefunction-probability under rotations in QM.

Then keep in mind that the cosmological/gravitational red shift is not the same as the Doppler red shift which arises because of relative motion of two bodies. The first arises because of space time expansion. If the star is moving away from us during a rotation around another star for example, we see a Doppler like red shift, but again that is no gravitational redshift that arises because the star moves away with the expanding space time continuum.

regards
marlon
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top