MHB Golden section and yin-yang symbol proportions

  • Thread starter Thread starter tongtu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Section Symbol
tongtu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, dear friends of mathhelpboards;

I stumbled with a striking claim in https://www.cut-the-knot.org/do_you_know/GoldenRatioInYinYang.shtml

Sorry, I couldn't paste the pic. The question is if there is an algebraical or trig proof for this claim, as the angle seems to be just 45º. Then, is there an EXACT proof for this claim?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What angle are you referring to? What do you mean by an "exact" proof?
 
Greg said:
What angle are you referring to? What do you mean by an "exact" proof?

Sorry, I got it. The solution is now in Cut the knot. Assuming, AB=1, AE=12 and BE=5‾√2. It follows that

BI=5‾√2+12=φ

BH=5‾√2−12=φ−1.

Problem solved! Thanks and sorry again.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Thread 'Useless continued fraction for 1'

I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
View full post »

Similar threads

New, on a physics hiatus, , really any physics psychologists?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top