Stanley514 said:
Wrong.Aluminum does have negative hall coeficient.And those metals which have positive Hall coefficient are not necessarily conduct only holes at room temp.Probably they conduct electrons too,but just slightly less then holes.If you want to prove something different, give a link.
Thank you for correcting me. My source may have been (probably been) mistaken.
Moderators, please forgive me!
There is a very odd discrepancy for the Hall coefficient in my sources. There is probably some convention that changed.
First, I took the Hall coefficient from my favorite book on solid state physics:
“Introduction to Solid State Physics”, 7th ed. by Charles Kittel (Wiley, 1996) p167
There is no link to Charles Kittel’s book. However, I may have to buy a new book on solid state physics because of this mistake of Kittel’s.
On page 167, there is a table with Hall coefficients in CGS units. The value of the Hall coefficient is:
R_H=+1.136x10^-24.
The number of free carriers per atom is also calculated in the metals. For aluminum, the table says that there is 1 hole per atom of aluminum.
Moderators, please note. I was quoting directly from Charles Kittel, which is considered a very good textbook on solid state physics. I did not make this “fact” up. I looked it up. If there is a mistake, it was from Charles Kittel. Please forgive me!
Now, I have a link
http://disse.org.br/LabsemCursos/uploads/Materiaiseletricos/HallEffect,3Ed.pdf
The value of the Hall coefficient is:
-3.5x10^-11 m^3A^-1 s^-1.
I found still another link that says the Hall coefficient that says that the Hall coefficient changes with field strength.
http://courses.washington.edu/phys431/hall_effect/hall_effect.pdf
“A number of materials show a striking difference between the weak and strong field limits; aluminum is one.”
I didn’t know about this difference between field limits. I don’t know which is Kittel’s but I was going by that. I wonder if this is what the OP wanted.
So this is interesting. I hope someone explains how the field strength changes the Hall coefficient of aluminum.
There may also be a matter of allotropes. I don't know if solid aluminum comes in different phases. Maybe one phase has valence-hole carriers and one phase has conduction-electron carriers.
Never the less, this is Kittel's error. Moderators, please don't kick me off for this. A reputable source did tell me that aluminum is a hole conductor.