Grad Admissions: How Much Does Sub-Department Matter?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of sub-department selection on graduate admissions in Physics. It is established that certain subfields, such as High Energy Physics (HEP) Theory, are significantly more competitive than others. Admissions decisions are influenced by the number of available spots allocated to each subfield, which is determined by factors like faculty grants and the size of graduating classes. Consequently, applicants with similar qualifications may experience different outcomes based solely on their chosen sub-department.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of graduate admissions processes in academia
  • Familiarity with Physics subfields such as AMO Experiment, HEP, Plasma Physics, and Condensed Matter
  • Knowledge of factors influencing admissions decisions, including GPA and GRE scores
  • Awareness of faculty research interests and funding in graduate programs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the competitive landscape of various Physics subfields
  • Explore the role of faculty grants in graduate admissions
  • Investigate the impact of research experience on application outcomes
  • Learn about the dynamics of student mobility between subfields in graduate studies
USEFUL FOR

Prospective graduate students in Physics, academic advisors, and admissions committee members seeking insights into the nuances of graduate admissions based on sub-department selection.

tapieoca
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm browsing through some acceptances posted by prospective graduate students here: http://www.physicsgre.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4274
and there are some guys with very close to 4.0 GPAs and great GRE scores along with pretty good research experiences and letters of recommendations that are getting rejected from top schools when other students with lower GPA and GRE scores but with similar research experience are getting accepted to them. The only real difference I noticed is the field within Physics they applied for.

When applying to a department in general, how much does the sub-department you're applying for matter? For example, in Physics they have different sub-fields such as AMO Experiment, HEP, Plasma Physics, Condensed Matter, etc. If those students who got rejected applied to a different field (and possibly done their research in a different area), would that have affected their application?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


tapieoca said:
I'm browsing through some acceptances posted by prospective graduate students here: http://www.physicsgre.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4274
and there are some guys with very close to 4.0 GPAs and great GRE scores along with pretty good research experiences and letters of recommendations that are getting rejected from top schools when other students with lower GPA and GRE scores but with similar research experience are getting accepted to them. The only real difference I noticed is the field within Physics they applied for.

When applying to a department in general, how much does the sub-department you're applying for matter? For example, in Physics they have different sub-fields such as AMO Experiment, HEP, Plasma Physics, Condensed Matter, etc. If those students who got rejected applied to a different field (and possibly done their research in a different area), would that have affected their application?
Yes, certain sub-departments are harder to get in than others.
For instance, HEP Theory is the hardest to get in and in general, it's harder to get into the theory side.
 


The way it has worked at the universities I've been affiliated with is that at some point a decision will be made on how many graduate students will be accepted for that year. Then that will be broken down - so many spots for one field, so many for another - largely depending on factors such as the relative size of each subfield within the department, the number of students graduating, faculty members with grants, etc.

So yes some subfields are easier to get into than others.
 


I haven't seen in this regimented. one reason is that experience has shown that students interested in one thing coming in often get new and different ideas and move around. This is natural, as they might have heard of HEP and superconductivity, but not, say mesoscopic physics or thin films.

However, there is a sort of soft balancing. We're not going to accept a class that only wants to do solid state, or HEP, or theory, or experiment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
957
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K