Grad Admissions: How Much Does Sub-Department Matter?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of sub-department selection on graduate admissions in physics programs. Participants explore how different sub-fields, such as AMO Experiment, HEP, Plasma Physics, and Condensed Matter, may influence acceptance rates, particularly in relation to applicants' academic credentials and research experiences.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that certain sub-departments, like HEP Theory, are more competitive and harder to gain admission into compared to others.
  • One participant explains that admissions decisions are influenced by a predetermined number of spots allocated to each sub-field, which can depend on factors like faculty grants and the size of each subfield.
  • Another participant notes that while there is a general allocation for subfields, students often change their interests during the application process, which may affect the admissions dynamics.
  • There is a mention of a "soft balancing" approach in admissions to avoid an incoming class that is overly concentrated in one area of study.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that some subfields are more competitive than others, but there is no consensus on the extent or nature of this impact on admissions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific mechanisms and implications of sub-department selection.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include a lack of detailed data on acceptance rates across subfields and the variability of experiences across different universities. The influence of changing student interests on admissions is also noted but not fully explored.

tapieoca
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm browsing through some acceptances posted by prospective graduate students here: http://www.physicsgre.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4274
and there are some guys with very close to 4.0 GPAs and great GRE scores along with pretty good research experiences and letters of recommendations that are getting rejected from top schools when other students with lower GPA and GRE scores but with similar research experience are getting accepted to them. The only real difference I noticed is the field within Physics they applied for.

When applying to a department in general, how much does the sub-department you're applying for matter? For example, in Physics they have different sub-fields such as AMO Experiment, HEP, Plasma Physics, Condensed Matter, etc. If those students who got rejected applied to a different field (and possibly done their research in a different area), would that have affected their application?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


tapieoca said:
I'm browsing through some acceptances posted by prospective graduate students here: http://www.physicsgre.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4274
and there are some guys with very close to 4.0 GPAs and great GRE scores along with pretty good research experiences and letters of recommendations that are getting rejected from top schools when other students with lower GPA and GRE scores but with similar research experience are getting accepted to them. The only real difference I noticed is the field within Physics they applied for.

When applying to a department in general, how much does the sub-department you're applying for matter? For example, in Physics they have different sub-fields such as AMO Experiment, HEP, Plasma Physics, Condensed Matter, etc. If those students who got rejected applied to a different field (and possibly done their research in a different area), would that have affected their application?
Yes, certain sub-departments are harder to get in than others.
For instance, HEP Theory is the hardest to get in and in general, it's harder to get into the theory side.
 


The way it has worked at the universities I've been affiliated with is that at some point a decision will be made on how many graduate students will be accepted for that year. Then that will be broken down - so many spots for one field, so many for another - largely depending on factors such as the relative size of each subfield within the department, the number of students graduating, faculty members with grants, etc.

So yes some subfields are easier to get into than others.
 


I haven't seen in this regimented. one reason is that experience has shown that students interested in one thing coming in often get new and different ideas and move around. This is natural, as they might have heard of HEP and superconductivity, but not, say mesoscopic physics or thin films.

However, there is a sort of soft balancing. We're not going to accept a class that only wants to do solid state, or HEP, or theory, or experiment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K