Schools Grad School Admission Dilemma: Mechanical Engineering vs. Mathematics Background

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a graduate student's conditional acceptance into a mechanical engineering program, requiring them to take a fluid mechanics course despite having completed an advanced fluid mechanics course at the graduate level. The student seeks opinions on the school's decision to enforce this requirement. Responses highlight that the school's insistence may stem from a desire for students to grasp engineering-specific applications and techniques that might not be covered in a theory-heavy course. The student acknowledges the need to communicate with the university about their prior coursework while reflecting on the differences between theoretical and engineering-focused fluid mechanics. The conversation emphasizes understanding the rationale behind academic requirements and the importance of aligning educational backgrounds with program expectations.
member 428835
Hi pf!

I was wondering if any of you can lend your opinion on my situation: I've been conditionally accepted into a graduate school for mechanical engineering although my undergrad was in mathematics. Evidently to gain full admission I am required to take a 300 level course, namely fluid mechanics. However, I have taken, from this university, the advanced fluid mechanics at the 500 level (yes, I received graduate credit for this).

My question is, do you agree with the schools decision? If so can you explain why? If not, please let me know.

Thanks a ton! For the record, yes, I am going to contact the university to make sure they are aware of the situation, but I wanted to seek advice before talking with them.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would argue that it is really irrelevant whether or not people on pf agree with the school's decision. All that can be done is you can explain to the school that you've taken advanced fluid mechanics and think that the requirement you take fluid mechanics there is unnecessary.

They will ultimately decide what they decide and then you can choose whether or not to attend.
 
Thanks for the reply, and while you're being logical, this is something I'm aware of. I'm trying to think of reasons why they would enforce this...again, thanks for the reply
 
Without knowing more about the course that you took and the course they want you to take, this is a very unclear situation. You did your undergraduate degree in math, so would I be wrong to assume that the fluid mechanics course you took had a greater emphasis on the theory behind fluid mechanics (i.e. it was a physics course)? If so, maybe they want you to take the course they offer because it offers a greater emphasis on the engineering aspects of fluid mechanics.

If this is in fact the case, the degree to which I would accept taking the course would depend on how comfortable you are with 'an engineer's perspective'. Specifically, I mean knowing the techniques in engineering classes for project planning, making approximations, etc... that sometimes aren't taught in theory oriented classes.

That's my two cents, good luck!
 
That's an interesting thought (your entire post). And thinking about it, yes, I was taking a physics course with an engineering title...thanks, you've given me some thought here.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top