Gradient in spherical coordinates problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the gradient of a scalar field in spherical coordinates, specifically addressing the additional terms that appear compared to the Cartesian representation. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and the application of the chain rule in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the gradient in spherical coordinates, particularly regarding the terms involving \(\frac{1}{r}\) and \(\frac{1}{r \sin(\theta)}\) that are not present in the Cartesian form.
  • Another participant explains that the gradient in Cartesian coordinates can be transformed into spherical coordinates using the chain rule, although they acknowledge the process is tedious.
  • A later reply suggests defining the gradient operator in terms of the differential displacement in spherical coordinates, indicating a method to derive the desired gradient expression.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the understanding of the gradient in spherical coordinates, with ongoing confusion and requests for clarification regarding the additional terms.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of transforming derivatives between coordinate systems and the potential for misunderstanding the implications of the additional terms in the gradient expression.

Theoretiker
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I need help. The topic is a gradient in spherical coordinates. In cartesian it is clear but in spherical coordinates I have two terms which I don't understand from where they come.

Okay, I have a scalar field in spherical coordinates:

\Phi = \Phi(r, \theta, \phi)

I thought that this is the gradient but it is wrong and I don't know why :(

grad \Phi = \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial r} \vec{e}_{r} + \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial \theta} \vec{e}_{\theta} + \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial \phi} \vec{e}_{\phi}

My mathbook tells me that this is the gradient in spherical coordinates but I don't understand the terms \frac{1}{r} and \frac{1}{r \sin(\theta)}

grad \Phi = \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial r} \vec{e}_{r} + \frac{1}{r} ~ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial \theta} \vec{e}_{\theta} + \frac{1}{r \sin(\theta)} ~ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial \phi} \vec{e}_{\phi}


I would be thank you for helping :)

greetings

P.S.
Sorry for my bad english. I will practice and learn grammar for better english in the future ;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In Cartesian coordinates
\grad \phi= \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y}\vec{j}+ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial z}\vec{k}
Now you have to use the chain rule to convert those derivatives to spherical coordinates:
\frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial \rho}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}
It's tedious but doable.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Now you have to use the chain rule to convert those derivatives to spherical coordinates:

This is what I don't saw. Thank you :)
 
you can define the gradient operator such that :

d \Phi = \left< grad \Phi , d\vec{r}\right >

knowing that in spherical coordinates :

d\vec{r}\right = \vec{e}_{r} dr + \vec{e}_{\theta} \cdot r d\theta + \vec{e}_{\phi} \cdot r \cdot sin(\theta) d\phi

then you should find what you want.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K