B Gram-Schimidt orthonormalization for three eigenvectors

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Wrichik Basu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the Gram-Schmidt orthonormalization process for three eigenvectors of a matrix A. The user provides equations for orthogonalizing the eigenvectors but questions the correctness of the third equation. Participants point out a critical issue with the notation, noting that using the same subscript for all three vectors implies they are identical, which is a typo. The conversation emphasizes the importance of distinct subscripts for clarity in vector representation. The final takeaway is that ensuring proper notation is essential for verifying the orthonormalization process.
Wrichik Basu
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,180
Reaction score
2,717
Say I have a matrix ##A## and it has three eigenvectors ##|\psi_1\rangle##, ##|\psi_2\rangle## and ##|\psi_3\rangle##. I want to orthogonalize these. Say my orthogonalized eigenvectors are ##|\phi_1\rangle##, ##|\phi_2\rangle## and ##|\phi_3\rangle##.
$$
\begin{eqnarray}
|\phi_1\rangle = \frac{|\psi_1\rangle}{|| \psi_1 ||} \\
\text{ } \nonumber \\
\phi_2 = \dfrac{ \left\{| \psi_2\rangle - \langle\phi_1 | \psi_2\rangle |\phi_1\rangle \right\} }{|| \{ \cdots \} ||} \\
\text{ } \nonumber \\
\phi_3 = \dfrac{ \left\{| \psi_3\rangle - \langle\phi_1 | \psi_3\rangle |\phi_1\rangle - \langle\phi_2 | \psi_3\rangle |\phi_2\rangle \right\} }{|| \{ \cdots \} ||}
\end{eqnarray}$$
Our teacher didn't explain this at all. I learned from this video, where the professor has done upto Eqn. (2) only. Can you check whether the third equation above is correct or not?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Wrichik Basu said:
Say I have a matrix ##A## and it has three eigenvectors ##|\psi_1\rangle##, ##|\psi_1\rangle## and ##|\psi_1\rangle##. I want to orthogonalize these. Say my orthogonalized eigenvectors are ##|\phi_1\rangle##, ##|\phi_2\rangle## and ##|\phi_3\rangle##.
$$
\begin{eqnarray}
|\phi_1\rangle = \frac{|\psi_1\rangle}{|| \psi_1 ||} \\
\text{ } \nonumber \\
\phi_2 = \dfrac{ \left\{| \psi_2\rangle - \langle\phi_1 | \psi_2\rangle |\phi_1\rangle \right\} }{|| \{ \cdots \} ||} \\
\text{ } \nonumber \\
\phi_3 = \dfrac{ \left\{| \psi_3\rangle - \langle\phi_1 | \psi_3\rangle |\phi_1\rangle - \langle\phi_2 | \psi_3\rangle |\phi_2\rangle \right\} }{|| \{ \cdots \} ||}
\end{eqnarray}$$
Our teacher didn't explain this at all. I learned from this video, where the professor has done upto Eqn. (2) only. Can you check whether the third equation above is correct or not?
I suggest you edit your three original vectors.
 
Michael Price said:
I suggest you edit your three original vectors.
You mean to say that I should write them such that they are orthogonal to each other?
 
Wrichik Basu said:
You mean to say that I should write them such that they are orthogonal to each other?
Write them in such a way that they have different subscripts. :oldsmile:
 
kuruman said:
Write them in such a way that they have different subscripts. :oldsmile:
:olduhh: Went tangentially past my brain. How would different subscripts matter?
 
Wrichik Basu said:
:olduhh: Went tangentially past my brain. How would different subscripts matter?
You used the same subscript ##_1## for all three vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu
Wrichik Basu said:
Say I have a matrix ##A## and it has three eigenvectors ##|\psi_1\rangle##, ##|\psi_1\rangle## and ##|\psi_1\rangle##.
If they have the same subscript, they are the same vector - it's just a typo fix. You can check whether you have the correct expression for the third eigenvector by seeing if ##\langle \phi_3|\phi_j\rangle\ = \delta_{3j}.##
 
kuruman said:
If they have the same subscript, they are the same vector - it's just a typo fix.
Fixed typo.
 
Back
Top