Grand canonical and canonical ensemble

mimpim
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Suppose that we have a system of particles (I am assuming a general system), and I want to find the ground state energy ##E_0##. We know that we can consider our system by canonical ensemble formalism OR by grand canonical ensemble so that ##H_G=H-\mu N## (in which ##H## is the Hamiltonian in canonical ensemble and ##H_G## is the grand canonical Hamiltonian).

My question is this: If I find the ground energy ##E_0## in either of them, then they would be the same?

Any explanation is welcomed
Thanks
 
mimpim said:
My question is this: If I find the ground energy ##E_0## in either of them, then they would be the same?

To be pedantic, the grand canonical ensemble actually doesn't describe a system with a fixed number of particles. Rather, it describes a system where the number of particles is fluctuating (being exchanged with the environment). However, in practice, the number fluctuations usually tends to zero in the thermodynamic limit so you can use the GCE for a fixed number of particles anyways. The prescription is to compute the mean number of particles in your system, and then set your chemical potential to whatever value it needs to be such that the "mean number of particles" equals the actual number of particles. If your particle fluctuations are small (you should be able to check this), your resulting system will be totally equivalent to the canonical ensemble.

This actually turns out to be a godsend in many systems, since computing the grand partition function for a many-particle system is often much easier than computing the canonical partition function, where you need to sum over configurations with a fixed number of particles which may require some constraint due to quantum particle statistics.
 
The two ensembles become usually equivalent in the thermodynamic limit, i.e. ##V \to \infty## and ## N \to \infty## with ##N/V## fixed.
 
king vitamin said:
To be pedantic, the grand canonical ensemble actually doesn't describe a system with a fixed number of particles.
Yes, sure, but why should this be a problem in the context of the question?
 
DrDu said:
Yes, sure, but why should this be a problem in the context of the question?

Since the CE does describe a system with a fixed number of particles, pointing out this difference is important when addressing the OP's question (roughly: "When are the two ensembles equivalent?").
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top