Graph Theory: Prove Tree Has No Cycles & Adding Edge Creates Cycle

Click For Summary
A graph is a tree if it is connected and contains no cycles, with exactly n-1 edges. To prove this, one must show that a tree's properties ensure that adding any new edge creates exactly one cycle. The proof involves demonstrating that if a graph is a tree, it is acyclic and connected, and adding an edge introduces a cycle. Conversely, if a graph allows for the insertion of an edge that creates a cycle, it must be shown that the graph is connected and acyclic, confirming it is a tree. This establishes the equivalence between being a tree and the specified properties regarding cycles and edges.
pupeye11
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that a graph is a tree if and only if it has no cycles and the insertion of any new edge always creates exactly one cycle.

The Attempt at a Solution



Assume that a graph G is connected and contains no vertices with a degree of zero.

So would I get my proof by proving that the graph is a tree and it is connected and has n-1 edges which proves it has no cycles and then prove that adding a edge would create a cycle making the first statement false. Does this work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two directions. In the first, you have a tree. Facts about trees: they are connected and acyclic. It is a fact that a tree has exactly n-1 edges, but depending on what you are allowed to assume, you may need to prove this. Starting from these facts, you must prove that adding any additional edge will create a cycle. In the second, you have a graph such that the insertion of any edge creates a cycle. You must prove that this graph is a tree, i.e. connected and acyclic.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K