I Grating Resolving Power of Laser Beams with Gaussian Distribution

Click For Summary
Grating resolving power calculations typically assume a uniform distribution, leading to airy disks based on the Rayleigh criterion. For Gaussian laser beams, the standard resolvance definition may not apply, as it relies on uniformity. The formula for resolving power, R = λ/Δλ = mN, where m is the order and N is the number of illuminated slits, remains straightforward without incorporating the beam's width. Introducing a function of the 1/e^2 width (wo) complicates the resolution estimation unnecessarily. Ultimately, the resolving power for a truncated Gaussian beam is expected to decrease compared to that of a uniform beam.
mikey1234
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Grating resolving power for Gaussian Beams vs Uniform incidence
All resources I’ve found for grating resolving power assume uniform distribution on the grating and produce airy disks. Resolvance is determined by the Rayleigh criterion where the peak of one wavelength is at the minima of the adjacent one. This definition doesn’t seem applicable for Gaussian laser beams.

How does the grating resolving power of Lamda/(delta Lambda) = mN, where m is the order (assume 1) and N is the number of slits illuminated change for a diffraction limited laser beam with a Gaussian distribution? Let’s say our criterion for resolvance is separating the peaks by wo (1/e^2 width) diameter.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The resolution formula is used to estimate the resolution of a diffraction grating spectrometer, and there is very little to be gained by trying to do the calculation for a beam with a Gaussian distribution. The resolving power ## R=\frac{\lambda}{ \Delta \lambda}=N m ## is a nice simple one, and it would unnecessarily complicate matters to have some function of ## w_o ## in this formula.
 
The resolution power for truncated Gaussian beam would only decrease compare to the uniform beam.
 
Thread 'How to model converging illumination through object plane (in ZEMAX)'
Hello community, I'm designing a projection lens system for a 35mm film projector in Zemax OpticStudio and struggling with the correct sequential mode setup for the illumination geometry. The light source is a Xenon short-arc lamp reflected by an ellipsoid mirror, which creates a converging cone with a 40.6 degree full angle that passes through the film gate. The film gate is my object plane, but the light doesn't diverge from it like a typical Lambertian source. Instead, the converging...