I Grating Resolving Power of Laser Beams with Gaussian Distribution

AI Thread Summary
Grating resolving power calculations typically assume a uniform distribution, leading to airy disks based on the Rayleigh criterion. For Gaussian laser beams, the standard resolvance definition may not apply, as it relies on uniformity. The formula for resolving power, R = λ/Δλ = mN, where m is the order and N is the number of illuminated slits, remains straightforward without incorporating the beam's width. Introducing a function of the 1/e^2 width (wo) complicates the resolution estimation unnecessarily. Ultimately, the resolving power for a truncated Gaussian beam is expected to decrease compared to that of a uniform beam.
mikey1234
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Grating resolving power for Gaussian Beams vs Uniform incidence
All resources I’ve found for grating resolving power assume uniform distribution on the grating and produce airy disks. Resolvance is determined by the Rayleigh criterion where the peak of one wavelength is at the minima of the adjacent one. This definition doesn’t seem applicable for Gaussian laser beams.

How does the grating resolving power of Lamda/(delta Lambda) = mN, where m is the order (assume 1) and N is the number of slits illuminated change for a diffraction limited laser beam with a Gaussian distribution? Let’s say our criterion for resolvance is separating the peaks by wo (1/e^2 width) diameter.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The resolution formula is used to estimate the resolution of a diffraction grating spectrometer, and there is very little to be gained by trying to do the calculation for a beam with a Gaussian distribution. The resolving power ## R=\frac{\lambda}{ \Delta \lambda}=N m ## is a nice simple one, and it would unnecessarily complicate matters to have some function of ## w_o ## in this formula.
 
The resolution power for truncated Gaussian beam would only decrease compare to the uniform beam.
 
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
Back
Top