Gravitational Collapse: Is Mass Referring to Rest Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date Start date
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
243
This question will show the superficiality of my understanding of relativity, so any help will be appreciated.
The question: When one says that gravitational collapse will occur to create a neutron star (or black hole) if the mass of the star is above a certain amount, is this referring to the rest mass?
The reason for the guess: the relativistic mass can be above this limit for one observer and below the limit for another observer, and the object cannot be collapsing for one observer and not for another observer.
Er...right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nomadreid said:
This question will show the superficiality of my understanding of relativity, so any help will be appreciated.
The question: When one says that gravitational collapse will occur to create a neutron star (or black hole) if the mass of the star is above a certain amount, is this referring to the rest mass?
The reason for the guess: the relativistic mass can be above this limit for one observer and below the limit for another observer, and the object cannot be collapsing for one observer and not for another observer.
Er...right?

Yes, it's the rest mass.
 
Thanks, nrqed.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top