Gravitational force on observed particle?

Xenoman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is there any experimental difference in gravitational force for a non-observed particle versus an observed particle in a gravitational field? Basically my question is if they fall with the same acceleration?

The observed particle is observed the entire fall, but both the observed and the non-observed particles are detected at some given distance further down at bottom. (Probably an average of all tests in the non-observed particle case is needed in order to compare it to the observed one) The situation might be similar for electromagnetic waves.

Is there any quantum gravity theory that suggests that they should not fall with the same acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's problematic to arrange a proper control in this case because your measurement of the observed particle will change its motional state. Measurement induces a back-action on the particle.
 
Thank you for your answer, I see the problem. Is the gravitational attraction of a single particle that is observed as one would expect from classical physics (eg Newtonian gravity)? (Has it been proven experimentally?)
 
Xenoman said:
Thank you for your answer, I see the problem. Is the gravitational attraction of a single particle that is observed as one would expect from classical physics (eg Newtonian gravity)? (Has it been proven experimentally?)

Yes, it's been done with interference of neutrons. Which also answers your first question, I suppose.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top