Gravitational Lagrangian PE term

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of gravitational potential energy (PE) in a two-body Newtonian gravitation problem. The force between two masses is given by the equation f = G m₁ m₂ / r², leading to the integral of the force with respect to r resulting in U = -G m₁ m₂ / r for potential energy. The misconception arose from assuming that two potential energy terms should be included due to the presence of two objects, which was corrected to reflect that only one term is necessary. This insight is crucial for extending the understanding to N-body gravitational problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Newtonian mechanics principles
  • Understanding of gravitational force equations
  • Basic calculus for integration
  • Concept of potential energy in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gravitational potential energy in multi-body systems
  • Learn about Lagrangian mechanics and its application to gravitational systems
  • Explore N-body simulation techniques in astrophysics
  • Investigate the role of conservation laws in gravitational interactions
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in understanding gravitational interactions and potential energy calculations in multi-body systems.

Messages
36,793
Reaction score
15,756
I was just doing a simple 2-body Newtonian gravitation problem. The force on each mass is:

[tex]f=\frac{G m_1 m_2}{r^2}[/tex]

and the integral of the force wrt r is:

[tex]\int \! f \, dr = -\frac{G m_1 m_2}{r}[/tex]

So, since there are two forces in the system, one on each object, I had assumed that there would be two potential energy terms so the total potential energy would be twice the above integral, or:

[tex]U = -2\frac{G m_1 m_2}{r}[/tex]

but I checked my work using Newtonian mechanics it turns out that it gives the wrong equation of motion and the correct potential energy is only one times the integral.

So, my question is, can anyone explain how I should have known to only include one times the energy even though there were two objects, and how I can generalize to N-body problems.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
969
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
449
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K