Gravitons: Explained for New Learners

  • Thread starter Thread starter LeeJeffries
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitons
LeeJeffries
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am new to all this "stuff", so please forgive me

If GR describes gravity as a straightline movement through a curved space-time, why does there need to be a "carrier" at the quantum level? What would it be carried between?

When people say at the quantum level GR stops working, is there a simple way of explaining why that is? I know its something in the maths compared with what is observed, but is there any way for me to understand what exactly "isn't working"?

Thanks
Lee
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GR is not a quantum theory, as you'll be aware, so it has no need of gravitons as it stands.

The quantum field theories we know are based on a Lagrangian that has terms for (say) 2 particles and the interaction between them. If the particles exchange energy and momentum, it is via the interaction term. In a quantum theory the energy exchange is quantized and those interaction quanta are the virtual particles, or carriers.

The problem with quantizing Newtonian gravity is that it is unrenormalizable because of the gravitational self energy.

The nearest thing to a Lagrangian in GR is the Einstein-Hilbert action, which seems to have no interaction term and describes a kinematical ( as opposed to dynamic) system. So the recipe for making a quantum theory doesn't work in the first place.

When people talk about gravitons they are assuming that a 'standard' quantum field theory for gravity will be found where the interaction term in the Lagrangian will be the product of two rank-2 tensors, something like AmnTmn where A is a tensor potential and T is the energy momentum tensor of the source. This will give a carrier particle with spin-2 for attraction and one with spin-0 for repulsion.

[caution - I'm not an expert so don't take this as a complete or 100% correct answer]
 
Last edited:
We have three forces in nature: strong, electroweak, and gravitational. The first two are quantized. If you try to couple a quantized field to a non-quantized one, you get a theory that is not self-consistent. E.g., this is what Bohr and his followers wanted to do in the early 20th century: quantize the atom while keeping the electromagnetic field classical. It doesn't work. For example, if a classical EM wave impinges on some quantized atoms, ionizing some of them via the photoelectric effect, there is no way to to maintain conservation of energy.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top