Gravity/density equation? Giant ball of water

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding an equation to determine density while considering an object's center of gravity, specifically for a spherical object like an Earth-sized volume of water. It highlights the need to account for increased density as one approaches the center of mass. Comparisons are made to atmospheric density changes with altitude, referencing concepts like the adiabatic lapse and barometric formula. However, the key distinction noted is the difference in density and compressibility between gases and liquids. The conversation seeks a straightforward equation for calculating density changes relative to distance from the center of mass.
Vree
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Can you help me find the equation for determining density when also taking the object's own center of gravity into account?
For example, say I have an Earth-sized volume of water (or pick any simple spherical object). You have to account for the increase of density as you go closer to the center of mass. Is there a simple equation to determine the change of density from R distance from the center of mass in this case?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vree said:
Can you help me find the equation for determining density when also taking the object's own center of gravity into account?
For example, say I have an Earth-sized volume of water (or pick any simple spherical object). You have to account for the increase of density as you go closer to the center of mass. Is there a simple equation to determine the change of density from R distance from the center of mass in this case?

Thanks!

There are good analogies with calculating the change in density of the atmosphere with altitude. Google "adiabatic lapse" and "barometric formula". The difference between the atmosphere and a "big ball of water" is obviously two-fold -- the denisty and the compressibility are very different for the two.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
8K
Back
Top