B Gravity facts, or close to fact

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter omnip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Facts Gravity
omnip
Hi,

Hopefully I am not asking to simple questions, but I am just confused from all internet information, and could need some help to shed light on a few things related to gravity, just to make it an undoubtfull fact to work with.

When I am correct, gravity is a consequence ?
What I have read is that Einstein said gravity is a consequence of a lot of matter that distorts space-time arround it, which makes other objects being pulled into that distorted space-time curvure, towards earth. This makes it look like gravity is a force, but it is not.
Is this the true complete picture, fact ?

Also, why does venus not get sucked into the sun ? The gravitational pull of the sun is huge, especially at that short distance towards venus. Yet it does not get closer to the sun, how ?
I read that planets keep their orbit due to the speed they have, but that does not make sense to me, they close in and increase distance all the time, this would make the speed obsolete to explain the not being pulled in due to high gravitatinal force. Can anyone help me out on this ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your second question about Venus and planetary orbits belongs over in the Classical Physics Section. Please start a new thread there for that question.
 
Hi Nugatory,

I am sorry, but that I do not understand. How can my question about suns gravity on venus not belong to the special + general relativity section ?
I mean, I aint looking for the orbit or movement, but an answer in relation to gravity, does that not belong here (also) ?

PS: Very possible would be that an answer comes from space-time curvure...
 
omnip said:
Hi Nugatory,
I am sorry, but that I do not understand. How can my question about suns gravity on venus not belong to the special + general relativity section ?
It is completely covered by Newton's classical theory of gravity, no general relativity involved.
Just as you must learn to stand up before you can run, you cannot understand general relativity and Einstein's theory of gravity until you have a solid understanding of classical mechanics and Newton's theory of gravity.
 
Last edited:
omnip said:
What I have read is that Einstein said gravity is a consequence of a lot of matter that distorts space-time around it, which makes other objects being pulled into that distorted space-time curvure, towards earth. This makes it look like gravity is a force, but it is not.
Is this the true complete picture, fact ?
Now this part is a relativity question...
It's not just matter that curves spacetime. The curvature is determined by a mathematical object called the "stress-energy tensor" , which includes energy and pressure as well as matter. However, for many interesting and important problems it turns out that the contribution from matter is the only one that is large enough to influence the results significantly, so we often can ignore everything else.

To understand how spacetime curvature produces effects that look like forces but aren't, search this forum for two short videos made by our member @A.T. They are waaayyy better (and shorter) than most of the stuff out on the internet.
 
  • Like
Likes omnip
omnip said:
I have read is that Einstein said gravity is a consequence of a lot of matter that distorts space-time arround it, which makes other objects being pulled into that distorted space-time curvure, towards earth. This makes it look like gravity is a force, but it is not. Is this the true complete picture, fact ?
To understand the local picture have a look at these videos:





For the global picture look at the links in the video description of the first clip (at youtube).
omnip said:
I read that planets keep their orbit due to the speed they have, but that does not make sense to me, they close in and increase distance all the time, this would make the speed obsolete to explain the not being pulled in due to high gravitatinal force. Can anyone help me out on this ?
This sounds like you have to learn Newtonian laws of motion first, and how centripetal acceleration is related to radius and tangential speed. Your misunderstanding here is not specific to gravity:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centripetal_force

Unfortunately explaining orbits in GR requires too many dimensions, so you cannot visualize it as easily as the radial falls above.
 
  • Like
Likes omnip
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top