Gravity in Water: Effects on Dropped Objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter jared30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Water
AI Thread Summary
When an object is dropped underwater, gravity's pull remains constant, but drag significantly slows its descent. The dynamics of an object submerged in water must account for both buoyancy and drag, which can be modeled using differential equations. The provided equation incorporates mass, fluid density, body density, gravity, volume, area, and drag coefficient, emphasizing the importance of accurate definitions for drag terms. For varying heights, factors like fluid density, volume, and area should be treated as functions of displacement. The discussion also notes that buoyancy effects are typically negligible in air but become crucial for lighter objects, such as helium balloons.
jared30
what are the effects on gravity if the object is dropped underwater?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gravity's pull is the same, you just have a lot more drag underwater so it falls more slowly
 
so are there any equations for the free fall acceleration of an object underwater?
 
There is also a Bouyant force acting on a body underwater, this acts to reduce the "weight" of a body.

To model dynamics underwater you would need to take bouyancy and drag into account. There are different ways of modeling drag, usually it is a lossy term in the inital differential equations which is depentend on velocity.
 
m(d2x/dt2) = (rhoB-rhoA)(g*V) - 0.5(Cd)(rhoA)(A)(dx/dt)^2

Where m = body's mass, rhoA = fluid's density, rhoB = body's density, g = gravity (may be assumed to vary with height -> which is where the "effects of gravity" come in), x = displacement, t = time, Cd = drag coefficient, V = body volume, A = body area.

If the height changes are vast, you would also probably want to make rho, V and A a function of x as well.

Be a bit careful with the drag term in the equation - some quoted values of Cd use, for example, wetted area while others use cross-sectional area. Check the definitions before using it.

You can analytically solve that, write up your own program to solve it numerically or buy a math program which is capable of solving differential equations - MathCad comes to mind. Option 1 will help you only in the most ideal circumstances, while option 3 is a bit more general. Option 2 is the most general but most difficult to learn, and will solve even your nasty partial integro-differential equations with the most unusual boundary conditions, etc.


Edit: Note that the equation here is for a fully submerged body. For a partially submerged one, break the first RHS term to the body weight and a bouyant force, the latter as per Archimedes' principle.
 
Last edited:
It's no different than an object dropped in air. Normally, though, one neglects the buoyancy in air, since what we drop is so much more dense than air. But an example where it cannot be neglected is a helium balloon.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top