Gravity violating the conservation of energy in a closed system?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a thought experiment questioning whether gravity violates the conservation of energy in a closed system. The initial premise involves two masses at rest, where the total energy is their rest mass. As gravity accelerates the masses towards each other, kinetic energy increases, raising concerns about energy conservation. The resolution lies in recognizing that the potential energy imparted when the second mass is introduced accounts for the energy discrepancy, maintaining the total energy balance. Ultimately, the law of conservation of energy holds true, as the increase in kinetic energy corresponds with a decrease in gravitational potential energy.
logos
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have devised a simple thought experiment which leads me to an absurd conclusion and I feel I’m missing something obvious but I can't see where I’m wrong and I hope you could help point out my error.

I start with an empty space initially containing two masses that are at rest relative to each other, the total energy of this system would be the rest mass (E=mc2) right?

But as time starts gravity will start accelerating these masses towards each other giving me the energy of the rest mass + a non 0 kinetic energy. This would in my mind imply either a decrease in the mass of the objects or an increase of the total energy of the closed system, neither of which seem logical?

Now I realize I’m probably missing something obvious here but I can't for my life figure out what…
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you put the first mass in the system, all is fine and dandy. However, by placing the second mass in the system, you obviously impart a potential energy to each mass. This potential energy is what accounts for the missing energy in your thought experiment.
 
What is the rest mass of a gravitationally bound system?

Presumably it is less than that of its components, by the amount of the escape energy. Might not be trivial to prove the difference in the system's inertia.
 
Last edited:
Pengwuino said:
When you put the first mass in the system, all is fine and dandy. However, by placing the second mass in the system, you obviously impart a potential energy to each mass. This potential energy is what accounts for the missing energy in your thought experiment.

Ah, of course. As I thought it’s obvious now that somebody pointed it out. I blame not noticing it myself on having substituted sleep with caffeine for to long now during exam season…

Anyway thanks so much for the help. :smile:
 
Be careful with those caffeine substitutions - they work for math but not so much for thought experiments in physics.

To add to the above:
Law of conservation of energy (simplified)
For this system -> Etotal = EK + EG
Where EK is the kinetic energy of the system and EG is the gravitational potential energy.

Etotal is constant in a closed system like the one you described, so you can see that as your masses are drawn together by the force of gravity, EG decreases as EK increases. :P
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top