Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Members
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around sharing and appreciating humorous and witty one-liners from the Physics Forums. Participants highlight various clever remarks, often related to physics, science, and the absurdities of homeopathy. Notable contributions include quips about relativity, the limitations of crayons, and humorous takes on homeopathic remedies. The thread also touches on the nature of scientific discourse, emphasizing that interesting questions often arise amid conflicting ideas. Additionally, there are playful exchanges about the nuances of communication, humor in technical discussions, and the importance of clarity in scientific explanations. Overall, the thread celebrates the blend of humor and intellect found within scientific discussions.
  • #101
Please try to remain on topic and avoid political statements, disguised or not.

I'll try to set the thread on its rails again:

Vanadium 50 said:
If you can't make a quantitative prediction, you don't really have a theory.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
If one does not perceive gravity then it has no effect. The experimental evidence can be found in Road Runner cartoons. ##-## @jbriggs444
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PhDeezNutz, strangerep, Astronuc and 6 others
  • #103
First, if you are angry enough to think you might have done damage to a house, you need to seriously consider anger management. ##-## @Vanadium 50
 
  • #104
phinds said:
You really not barking up the wrong tree with this so much as you are barking up a tree that doesn't even exist.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DaveE, strangerep, Astronuc and 3 others
  • #105
jbriggs444 said:
Approaches and becomes are not synonyms.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu and sysprog
  • #106
phinds said:
jbriggs444 said:
Approaches and becomes are not synonyms.
Did you recognize the irony considering your avatar?
 
  • #107
fresh_42 said:
Did you recognize the irony considering your avatar?
I know nothing. Nothing!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Borg, phinds and fresh_42
  • #108
1608670395150.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PhDeezNutz, DrClaude and BillTre
  • #109
sysprog said:
johann1301h0 said:
. . . is anyone here pedantic enough . . .
How do we measure that?
Whatever the SI unit of pedantry is, I'm sure a different unit is in common use in the USA. ##-## @Vanadium 50
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PhDeezNutz, sophiecentaur, Dale and 5 others
  • #110
Vanadium 50 said:
I will say if you need to invoke Wittgenstein to try and figure out what the OP means, it might be a sign that there might be a little bit of a clarity shortage.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes sophiecentaur, sysprog and Keith_McClary
  • #111
Dale said:
At greater than 200 posts I think it is pretty evident that there has been no stifling of the discussion whatsoever.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DrClaude, BillTre, Dale and 1 other person
  • #112
Vanadium 50 said:
You probably should look into such compulsions, because some of what you say is just not so.
 
  • #113
I HAVE to include these two of favorites of mine even if they are my own:

it is unfortunate that you "understand" this since it is totally wrong.

I recognize every single word in that post, but strung together in that particular order, I can't make any sense out of them at all.
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd, timmeister37, epenguin and 3 others
  • #114
"I don't want you to get the impression that it's just a question of the number of words. Getting them in the right order is just as important."

 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, DrGreg, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #115
Even though it was directed at me, I still have to appreciate it.

Vanadium 50 said:
Of course, if the student has never seen a determinant before, this is as useful as a Siamese-Swahili Dictionary. ("Once you know one, you can teach yourself the other!")
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42, berkeman and sysprog
  • #116
Infrared said:
Even though it was directed at me, I still have to appreciate it.
Vanadium 50 said:
Of course, if the student has never seen a determinant before, this is as useful as a Siamese-Swahili Dictionary. ("Once you know one, you can teach yourself the other!")
@Vanadium 50 (I think that he may be not-so-secretly one of the Vanir) is a very witty guy ##\dots##
 
  • #118
sysprog said:
not-so-secretly one of the Vanir)

"One of the Vanir" is an anagram of "Not heaven for I".

For what it's worth, I had determinants years before knowing anything about cross-products.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and sysprog
  • #119
gmax137 said:
Freya/Frigga cousin (she uses aliases)
[non-rigorous use of rightarrows in this post]
##\mathrm {vanir \rightarrow vana \rightarrow}## 'dis' ##\rightarrow## goddess ##\rightarrow## 'ium' [non-feminine ending] well I hope that this thread can continue to be about Great One-Liners :wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #120
Vanadium 50 said:
"One of the Vanir" is an anagram of "Not heaven for I".
What the X? Did you just notice that on autopilot, or is that a known thing? or maybe you really are one of the Vanir? and if so, maybe you'd rather be one of the Aesir?
For what it's worth, I had determinants years before knowing anything about cross-products.
I'm starting to become curious about you. :wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #121
The surest indicator of the quality of a human is how they treat those with less power. ##-## @hutchphd
 
  • #122
Vanadium 50 said:
For what it's worth, I had determinants years before knowing anything about cross-products.

I would guess that this is unusual. My expectation was that most of my students had seen cross products before in vector calculus or physics classes and I thought it worthwhile to give a linear algebra perspective. I taught them about determinants a couple of weeks prior, so they better had known about them...

sysprog said:
The surest indicator of the quality of a human is how they treat those with less power. ##-## @hutchphd

Related (and hopefully not too well known to be worth posting): "The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons." -Dostoevsky
 
Last edited:
  • #123
Infrared said:
I would guess that this is unusual. My expectation was that most of my students had seen cross products before in vector calculus or physics classes and I thought it worthwhile to a linear algebra perspective. I taught them about determinants a couple of weeks prior, so they better had known about them...

Related (and hopefully not too well known to be worth posting): "The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons." -Dostoevsky
Maybe my first calc teacher was a baseball, but maybe I didn't know that then ##-## my calc teacher was great ##-## I started operations research before linear algebra, so what do I know ##\dots##
 
Last edited:
  • #124
Why use that as an excuse to bring in photons? ##-## @sophiecentaur
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #125
You could approach your problem like any other project: write a functional specification document, classify the duties, estimate the necessary time to achieve each of the goals, prioritize, and make a project schedule. ##-## @fresh_42
 
  • #126
“One does not simply read a textbook, one works through a textbook” - @Vanadium 50
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes CalcNerd, strangerep, Hamiltonian and 3 others
  • #127
Is this better?

1610035805622.png
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian, gmax137, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #128
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, Vanadium 50, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #129
"Problems worthy of attack, prove their worth by hitting back." - Piet Hein
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd, Hamiltonian, PhDeezNutz and 2 others
  • #130
PhDeezNutz said:
“One does not simply read a textbook, one works through a textbook” - @Vanadium 50
I just look at the pictures!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian, PhDeezNutz, BillTre and 2 others
  • #131
PeroK said:
I just look at the pictures!
You also at least read the captions, too, right?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and PeroK
  • #132
sysprog said:
You also at least read the captions, too, right?
Yes, but sometimes I just skip to the end to see what happens.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and sysprog
  • #133
PeroK said:
I just look at the pictures!
That is you who @BillTre wants to write a book for?
BillTre said:
What do people use for drawing molecules (in a digital manner)?

I would like to make space filling type models as well as letters representing the atoms connected by lines at different angles.
The second kind I could make with ad drawing program, but there's got to be a better way.
 
  • #134
PeroK said:
I just look at the pictures!
For some subjects that works better than for others.
 
  • #135
You're not going to make this easy, are you? ##-## @Vanadium 50
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd, Hamiltonian and BillTre
  • #136
It's like using a piano keyboard as 'proof' that only certain frequencies of sound exist. Then talk to a violinist. ##-## @sophiecentaur
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd and BillTre
  • #137
gmax137 said:
I worked with a guy for over thirty years before he told me he was an accordion player. "I just don't talk about it," he said.
Just out of curiosity, what is funny or witty or interesting about this one ?
 
  • #138
timmeister37 said:
Just out of curiosity, what is funny or witty or interesting about this one ?
The accordian is the Rodney Dangerfield of musical instruments.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes strangerep and BillTre
  • #139
timmeister37 said:
gmax137 said:
I worked with a guy for over thirty years before he told me he was an accordion player. "I just don't talk about it," he said.
Just out of curiosity, what is funny or witty or interesting about this one ?
Dustin Hoffman and Warren Beatty,
playing "Rogers & Clarke" in the movie "Ishtar"
in the song "Dangerous Business":

Telling the truth can be dangerous business​
Honest and popular don't go hand in hand​
If you admit that you can play the accordion​
no-one will hire you in a rock & roll band​

In the mid-'80s I was a not-so-great accordionist ##-## only a little bit better on guitar ##-## my girlfriend could sing very well and was very good on piano ##-## we got a good laugh ##\dots##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and BillTre
  • #140
phinds said:
The accordian is the Rodney Dangerfield of musical instruments.
Its also Weird Al's favorite instrument!
 
  • #141
phinds said:
The accordian is the Rodney Dangerfield of musical instruments.
If you play the accordion, then musically you are on the road to nowhere:

 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and sysprog
  • #142
@PeroK, isn't the road to nowhere better than the highway to hell?



and yeah Steve Vai is a lot better at guitar than I am ##\dots##
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and PeroK
  • #143
timmeister37 said:
Just out of curiosity, what is funny or witty or interesting about this one ?
As I recall, @Vanadium 50 had posted something about gentlemen not playing trombones, I just followed up with accordions in a similar vein.

BTW, when I lived in New Orleans I saw a guy in the Quarter playing Jimi Hendix's "Voodoo Chile" on an accordion. That's something you don't forget.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and sysprog
  • #144
gmax137 said:
BTW, when I lived in New Orleans I saw a guy in the Quarter playing Jimi Hendix's "Voodoo Chile" on an accordion. That's something you don't forget

As much as you might want to.
 
  • #145
I thought of doing the Alan Parsons Project "I, Robot" song as an accordion piece ##-## bass on the left hand, chords on the right ##-## I wasn't good enough ##\dots##
 
  • #146
If you want to learn QFT, you should be looking at textbooks, not Wikipedia. ##-## @PeterDonis
 
  • #147
Vanadium 50 said:
[Boromir: "...one works through a textbook..."]
... but not the way Boromir would do it, i.e., slashing it into a zillion pieces with his trusty broadsword...
 
  • #148
strangerep said:
... but not the way Boromir would do it, i.e. ...
... and then dying halfway:nb)
 
  • #149
Proof by personal incredulity does not count. ##-## @jbriggs444
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Borg and OmCheeto
  • #150
sysprog said:
Proof by personal incredulity does not count. ##-## @jbriggs444
I think that could apply to a lot these days.
 
Back
Top