Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Members
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around sharing and appreciating humorous and witty one-liners from the Physics Forums. Participants highlight various clever remarks, often related to physics, science, and the absurdities of homeopathy. Notable contributions include quips about relativity, the limitations of crayons, and humorous takes on homeopathic remedies. The thread also touches on the nature of scientific discourse, emphasizing that interesting questions often arise amid conflicting ideas. Additionally, there are playful exchanges about the nuances of communication, humor in technical discussions, and the importance of clarity in scientific explanations. Overall, the thread celebrates the blend of humor and intellect found within scientific discussions.
  • #501
hmmm27 said:
I read The Lord of the Rings : lots of names begin with 'G'
It's Lord of the rings, lots of characters and lots of letters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #502
pinball1970 said:
It's Lord of the rings, lots of characters and lots of letters.
I was twelve ; I enjoyed the story, but who's-who was a lost cause after about halfway through The Two Towers.
 
  • #503
hmmm27 said:
I was twelve ; I enjoyed the story, but who's-who was a lost cause after about halfway through The Two Towers.
I don't have a copy at hand but I recall the last 200 pages of volume 3 was an Encyclopedia, including who's who and who was who...
 
  • #504
gmax137 said:
I don't have a copy at hand but I recall the last 200 pages of volume 3 was an Encyclopedia, including who's who and who was who...
Not the most efficient placement, for a first-time reader.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and weirdoguy
  • #505
hmmm27 said:
Not the most efficient placement, for a first-time reader.
You're kidding, right? If JRR had put his encyclopedia at the start of volume 1, he would have died and remained forever an unknown obscure academic. One in ten thousand readers would have read past page 25.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds, Vanadium 50 and PeterDonis
  • #506
gmax137 said:
One in ten thousand readers would have read past page 25.
I think I'd have started reading around page 201. I don't recall if I bought all 3 volumes at the same time or no, but I also don't recall thinking "Let me see if there's an encylopaedia built into book 3" (or for that matter the existence of the encyclopaedia, but that was quite awhile ago, and most of what I remember is "Why do all the character/place-names begin with 'G' ?")
 
  • #507
hmmm27 said:
"Why do all the character/place-names begin with 'G' ?")
There are plenty that start with F and T also.
Try List of Tolkien Names.

I'm impressed that JRR could keep them sorted in his mind.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #508
hmmm27 said:
I was twelve ; I enjoyed the story, but who's-who was a lost cause after about halfway through The Two Towers.
Good job you didnt try out the Silmarillion!
 
  • #509
  • #510
pinball1970 said:
Good job you didnt try out the Silmarillion!
I did... didn't get too far ; again, twelve. I haven't read The Hobbit either, though I imagine it's a comparatively easy read.
 
Last edited:
  • #511
hmmm27 said:
I haven't read The Hobbit either, though I imagine it's a comparitively easy read.
I was exposed to "The Hobbit" in year 9 high school English class. It was one of the prescribed literature textbooks, but our teacher refused to teach anything about it. She thought it was nonsense -- far beneath her. (Tbh, I didn't like her much at all. A literature teacher who doesn't comprehend the achievements of J.R.R. Tolkien?? Sheesh.)

"The Hobbit" is interesting in that the writing starts off with a rather childish tone -- well below year 9, I'd have thought. Not to mention the silly poems/songs.

Then the tone soon becomes more mature as the chapters advance.
 
  • Like
Likes hmmm27 and Borg
  • #512
I took a speed reading class and then was able to read War and Peace in twenty minutes.

It's about Russia.

That was Woody Allen.
 
  • #513
I'm not sure if I'm allowed to self-report, but this is from a PM discussion with a couple members after they wasted a fair amount of time and effort trying to help a user in the EE forum who mainly seemed clueless about their AC Mains project they kept asking about, but turned out to have ulterior motives...

berkeman said:
Yeah, very sorry about that, what a waste of our time and effort. He was a help vampire and hacker hidden in clueless sheep's clothing. (That might be a record for mixing metaphors...) :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, Bystander and Vanadium 50
  • #514
Hacker hidden in clueless sheep's clothing? Maybe he's just not the sharpest cookie in the jar.
 
  • #515
Vanadium 50 said:
Hacker hidden in clueless sheep's clothing? Maybe he's just not the sharpest cookie in the jar.
Doh! :smile:
 
  • #516
Link limited to a select group !

1689181800082.png

1689181842828.png
 
  • #517
BvU said:
Link limited to a select group !
Yes, it's from a PM conversation. :smile:
 
  • #518
Or...you can lead a gift horse to water but you can't look in his mouth.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Klystron, BillTre and jbriggs444
  • #519
I always thought the gifted horses were the ones stomping out answers to arithmetic questions...
 
  • #520
gmax137 said:
I always thought the gifted horses were the ones stomping out answers to arithmetic questions...
They could also just be horses given to someone.
 
  • #521
gmax137 said:
I always thought the gifted horses were the ones stomping out answers to arithmetic questions...
HorseGPT.
 
  • #522
Vanadium 50 said:
HorseGPT.
ChatGPY and horses have one thing in common, at least: they both produce a lot of hotses.h...er...manure.
 
  • #523
Vanadium 50 said:
HorseGPT.
That could be a winner. People like animals. Could CatGPT lie ahead?

I kind of like the idea of ChatLSD but that might get old fast. Then again, maybe not.
 
  • #524
CatGPT would just ignore your questions.

Edit: This got me to thinking about Googling it and it turns out that CatGPT exists - https://cat-gpt.com
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes mathwonk, PeterDonis and dextercioby
  • #525
Hornbein said:
Could CatGPT lie ahead?
We already have it in French. :-p
 
  • #526
jack action said:
We already have it in French. :-p
Well dang. I've had this happen before. Last time it was Apocalypso. Someday soon anything you can imagine will already be there. Then what?

A ChatLSD search turned up the Charles Schwab brokerage. Who knew?

There was a ChatLSD on Instagram that has been removed.
 
Last edited:
  • #527
Hornbein said:
Who knew?
Timothy Leary?
 
  • #528
PeroK said:
This process of continually updating one's knowledge of a subject is called learning. It's the opposite of religiously adhering to an established view in the face of evidence to the contrary.
 
  • Like
Likes Flyboy, berkeman, Hornbein and 3 others
  • #529
pbuk said:
... if only there were some way of searching for information on the internet :wink:
This deserves to be in this thread in its own right, yeah?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, phinds, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #530
PeroK said
This process of continually updating one's knowledge of a subject is called learning. It's the opposite of religiously adhering to an established view in the face of evidence to the contrary.
I might borrow this one, if you don't mind.

-Dan
 
  • #531
Swamp Thing said:
This deserves to be in this thread in its own right, yeah?
That was my complaint about the title "Breaking bad."
 
  • #532
  • Like
Likes jack action
  • #533
In a discussion about a woman who had 69 children from 27 pregnancies (all multiple births):
BillTre said:
27 x .75 = 20.25 years
That so much more reasonable.
Very fertile, but also efficient.
 
  • #534
About questionable results in a new paper:

Vanadium 50 said:
At least it puts the woo in woo hoo.

:smile:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Tom.G, BillTre and topsquark
  • #535
When trying to help an EE student with analyzing fairly simple circuits, and they keep trying to use SPICE to guide their learning...

DaveE said:
You'll learn a lot more about electronics if you solve simple circuits with math before you simulate them. Simulations only give you answers, not reasons.
 
  • Like
  • Care
Likes Wrichik Basu and BillTre
  • #536
russ_watters said:
As a rule of thumb, when the first thing someone tells you is that their invention isn't a perpetual motion machine (before you can even think to ask), that means it's a perpetual motion machine.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, DennisN, Bystander and 5 others
  • #537
That sounds like a conversation that could go on forever.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre and berkeman
  • #538
gleem said:
There is no universal Least Action path to happiness.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, Vanadium 50, berkeman and 1 other person
  • #539
This one is way over my head... :smile:

Vanadium 50 said:
The fact that you can buy an oven mitt at all is proof of quantum mechanics.
 
  • #540
There is an explanation in that thread.
 
  • #541
From a thread where a math major is complaining that when he had to take a mandatory Physics course, he found the math in it to be very non-rigorous and not based on axioms...

andresB said:
Do you already know what the axioms of nature are?
 
  • #542
While trying to give a B-level reply to a question about the speed of propagation of changes in spacetime...

Ibix said:
It's actually quite difficult to come up with a well-defined way of saying what you are trying to say without either resorting to postgrad maths or saying something not really accurate and crossing your fingers behind your back and hoping nobody asks awkward questions.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and Ibix
  • #543
berkeman said:
From a thread where a math major is complaining that when he had to take a mandatory Physics course, he found the math in it to be very non-rigorous and not based on axioms...

From the very same thread:
russ_watters said:
I guarantee any stroke QM could give a mathematician, an engineer could make worse.
 
  • Haha
Likes DrClaude and DaveE
  • #544
From a thread discussing WiFi and Routers, @Vanadium 50 observed:

The number on the box is really mostly irrelevant. "Up to X Mbps" just means that they promise you won't get X+1.
 
  • #545
Vanadium on a post regarding David McCallum TV series.

pinball1970 said:
The Invisible man" 1975 series
V50 "I could never see him in that role."
 
  • Love
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes nsaspook, BillTre and DennisN
  • #546
Vanadium 50 said:
I could never see him in that role.
Not to be outdone our talented, the lovely,our very own @DennisN !!
"Also, as far as I can remember, the portrayal of the character was rather transparent."
 
  • #547
From a discussion in the Engineering forums about a part that a new user wants help designing:

Baluncore said:
If you have ignored the obvious failure modes, and so build a house of cards, that design failure may later be investigated by a Coroner.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and DaveC426913
  • #548
From a discussion thread in the Academic Advising forum where a newbie is asking for advice about learning resources...

gmax137 said:
As others have noted, learning physics by reading alone would be like learning to play piano by reading a book. It simply is not possible.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #549
berkeman said:
From a discussion thread in the Academic Advising forum where a newbie is asking for advice about learning resources...

gmax137 said:
As others have noted, learning physics by reading alone would be like learning to play piano by reading a book. It simply is not possible.
But the skills are transferable...

 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PeroK, collinsmark and berkeman
  • #550
Ibix said:
If I tell you that a scribblex is a fooddely scribblex if the warghandle is zero you might (reasonably) complain that this does not help you to understand what I'm talking about.
 
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970 and berkeman
Back
Top