Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Members
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread invites members to share and discuss humorous or insightful one-liners from Physics Forums, highlighting wit and cleverness in responses related to various topics in physics, mathematics, and science in general. The scope includes pithy remarks, humorous exchanges, and notable quotes from members, as well as some commentary on broader themes in science and reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants share one-liners that reflect humor in scientific discussions, such as comments on relativity and the limitations of crayons.
  • One participant notes the irony in the assertion that "thinking outside the box" requires understanding what is inside it.
  • Another humorous remark discusses the absurdity of "table/pillow duality" in relation to everyday objects.
  • A quote from a departed member emphasizes that interesting scientific questions often arise amidst conflicting ideas.
  • Several participants share humorous takes on homeopathy, including a quip about overdosing on homeopathic medication.
  • One exchange humorously highlights the redundancy of stating that wood is as strong as wood.
  • A participant reflects on the challenges of estimating forces in a humorous context, suggesting a light-hearted take on serious topics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share humorous observations and witty remarks, but there is no consensus on the validity or implications of the statements made, particularly regarding homeopathy and scientific reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Some remarks may rely on specific contexts or definitions that are not fully explored, such as the nature of homeopathic remedies and their purported effects. Additionally, the humor in some exchanges may depend on shared knowledge of prior discussions or scientific concepts.

  • #601
To be fair, my wife was cooking bacon at the time. So, yeah. The only other products that came to mind (eggs and tortillas) weren’t sold by weight.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #602
berkeman said:
Hey, waidaminute, why don't supermarkets have these anymore?
1709527210583.png

The quintessential 'banana for scale'.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and Dale
  • #603
exponent137 said:
Yes
For leaving V50 speechless. :-p

Vanadium 50 said:
Wow. Just wow.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, DrClaude, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
  • #604
Oh, I had a comment, all right. I just figured it would be best if kept to myself.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: marcusl, pinball1970, dextercioby and 5 others
  • #605
Vanadium 50 said:
That press release was...um...sufficiently rich in organic material that it could itself be used as a renewable fuel.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BillTre, marcusl, pinball1970 and 4 others
  • #606
In a thread asking about making food from just raw elements
BillTre said:
You have a series of different questions:
1) Can you eat the periodic table?
A: yes depending on what it is printed on.
:smile:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS, dextercioby, pinball1970 and 2 others
  • #607
In a thread discussing how to judge the validity of sources (not peer-reviewed):

Vanadium 50 said:
As they said "If it ducks like a quack..."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, DaveC426913, jack action and 2 others
  • #608
In a thread where the OP is trying to identify why a bracket has been failing before its expected life:
jrmichler said:
Syed7777777 said:
I'm trying to simulate this in FEA to identify the weak spots
No need for FEA to do that. The weak spots are where it breaks.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto, DrClaude, DaveE and 3 others
  • #609
berkeman said:
In a thread discussing how to judge the validity of sources (not peer-reviewed):
You had to be there.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #610
Sometimes we have to school newbies on the obvious...

Baluncore said:
Avoid sifting flour by the light of a candle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Borg
  • #611
1713363231482.png
 
  • #612
berkeman said:
In a thread discussing how to judge the validity of sources (not peer-reviewed):
As they said "If it ducks like a quack..."
This gets wittier the more I read it.

In fact, it's positively steal-worthy for some of the woo discussions I get caught in.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rive, BillTre and berkeman
  • #613
Yes, it's a pleasant mix of dyslexic double entendre and skepticism.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, Rive and BillTre
  • #614
Vanadium 50 said:
It's much easier to revolutionize the world if you don't have to put numbers in.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and sysprog1
  • #615
Upon witnessing the chaos unfolding in a different department at work, I once quipped “not my circus, not my monkeys.”

Only it came out as “not my cirkeys, not my monkus.”

It took a solid minute for everyone to stop laughing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and phinds
  • #616
I once was talking to my new boss from home on my flip phone but needed to take some notes so I asked her to "please give me a second to put on my head free handset. Fortunately she had a sense of humor and we both got a good laugh out of it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, pinball1970 and BillTre
  • #617
phinds said:
head free handset
For some calls I am on such a thing would be a welcome change... :wink:
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, pinball1970, phinds and 3 others
  • #618
From the thread about Dr. Hossenfelder's "7 Coincidences" video:

Vanadium 50 said:
I once stayed at a hotel room where the room number was the same as the mass of the Λ baryon. Coincidence? I think not!

:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: marcusl and PhDeezNutz
  • #619
@gleem giving more good advice and motivation in the Academic Advising forum... :smile:

gleem said:
That spark that you mentioned is what lights the fire that burns inside of you to find out what has yet to be learned.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, sysprog1, Borg and 3 others
  • #620
russ_watters said:
Here's the risk with engineers: we're creative and often have loose or missing screws, so if you constrain your problem insufficiently there is a decent chance the answer will involve a trebuchet.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, dwarde, DrClaude and 8 others
  • #621
googles trebuchet.......

still does not get the joke....
 
  • #622
pinball1970 said:
googles trebuchet.......

still does not get the joke....
The device under discussion was some kind of vaguely specified energy generation scheme involving animals (probably cattle) moving around and having their energy harvested somehow. At least some of the ideas involved fairly brutal accelerations when you ran the numbers. The vagueness was a cause of some frustration.

I'm not sure if Russ was implying he'd use the cattle as ammo ("Fetchez la vache!") or as the counterweight.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, Borg, berkeman and 2 others
  • #623
pinball1970 said:
googles trebuchet.......

still does not get the joke....
I think what he meant a word of caution: "please constrain your problem well enough or engineers will run with it in the direction they think is fun, rather than useful" Because hey, if you can make a trebuchet within the given specs, that's just way more fun :cool:.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, Hornbein, collinsmark and 6 others
  • #624
Ibix said:
"Fetchez la vache!"
Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, pinball1970, Ibix and 2 others
  • #625
jbriggs444 said:
It helps if you have worked and played outside during your formative years. Then most of this stuff is second nature.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and Klystron
  • #626
Borg said:
If Schwarzenegger shows up naked in my backyard, I'm hitting the report button.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, PhDeezNutz and BillTre
  • #627
pinball1970 said:
I never really got the title. Did he have a "breakdown" in the mental health sense? No! He was absolutely coherent, organised and focused. He was also very smart and professional, at every turn.
The concepts of 'doing bad' and making good with your life and talents appear often in this series. Walter, as Jessie's high school chemistry teacher, lectured about the benefits of applying oneself in order to achieve. See the portrait Jessie drew on the rear of a failed exam of Mr. White with a large screw. "Apply yourself!" Mr. White demands.

Later as criminal partners, Jessie refers archly and satirically to Walter "breaking bad" as per Gilligan's title. Jesse using this slang expression to describe White's behaviour begs the question, "Was Mr. White a good man driven after a cancer diagnosis to support his family via vile crimes, or was Walter always a suppressed criminal posing as a teacher who enjoys being master criminal Heisenberg?".

Jessie resolves this dilemma after contemplation during rehab, telling Walter, "I know this now, I am the bad guy.", leaving Walter to sort out his own morality.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #628
WWGD said:
Welcome to PF! I failed my Turing test, btw ;).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and WWGD
  • #629
Baluncore said:
If you are really trying to invent an accurate hand-wound mechanical clock, then you are 300 years too late. You are so far behind, that you think you are first.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: marcusl, Klystron and PhDeezNutz
  • #630
In a thread about those who decide to build a particle accelerator in their basement
Vanadium 50 said:
The correlation between ambition and cluelessness seems high.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, jack action, Klystron and 2 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K