Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Members
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around sharing and appreciating humorous and witty one-liners from the Physics Forums. Participants highlight various clever remarks, often related to physics, science, and the absurdities of homeopathy. Notable contributions include quips about relativity, the limitations of crayons, and humorous takes on homeopathic remedies. The thread also touches on the nature of scientific discourse, emphasizing that interesting questions often arise amid conflicting ideas. Additionally, there are playful exchanges about the nuances of communication, humor in technical discussions, and the importance of clarity in scientific explanations. Overall, the thread celebrates the blend of humor and intellect found within scientific discussions.
  • #201
PeroK said:
To "nerd out" is new to me. But, as the US linguistics professor said "one can verb any noun".

In Indonesian suffixes and prefixes can be used to systematically turn any word into an active verb, a passive verb, a noun, an abstract noun, an agent that executes an action, something that has been acted upon, or even several of these at the same time. I lived in Penestanan, which I was told means "the place of practitioners of black magic."
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith and PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #202
A. Neumaier said:
Nothing at all is gained by trying to avoid i.
Although said in the context of someone trying to do quantum mechanics without complex numbers, I also think it might make a great entry in a self-help book 😅 (something something lower case i something something taming ego something something)
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre, anorlunda, sysprog and 1 other person
  • #203
Nugatory said:
You were asking about the unpublished work of “amateur physicists”, and their work develops the science of physics about as much as palmistry develops the science of anatomy.
:bow:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Astronuc, strangerep, bhobba and 3 others
  • #204
Hey, don't "like" my post. I have my 8000. Go "like" the original by @Nugatory!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and Nugatory
  • #205
Vanadium 50 said:
Hey, don't "like" my oost.

"Oost"??

From the urban dictionary:

UrbanDictionary said:
oost
to dry hump someone of the same sex once with great vigor while they are bending over while shouting "OOST!", perhaps while they are picking up something. ideally an oost should knock someone over. oosts can be performed from a standstill or with a run up.

Vanadium 50 said:
I have my 8000. Go "like" the original by @Nugatory!
Then you'll have to post a link to the original. (I don't read each and every post on PF.)

In fact, maybe posting a link to the original should be a mandatory requirement for new posts in this thread?
 
  • #206
Post.
Now fixed.

There is a link to the original post, in the quote. Click the little arrow.
 
  • #207
Vanadium 50 said:
:bow:
That quote is two lines. I'm afraid I will have to disqualify your entry.
 
  • #208
Change your screen resolution.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Ivan Seeking, sysprog and bhobba
  • #209
Ivan Seeking said:
That quote is two lines. I'm afraid I will have to disqualify your entry.
Hey, when I started the thread, I said "Sometimes I see a line (or maybe a brief multiline) post . . ." ##-## and in all reasonable deference, I ask how should anyone presume to DQ an entry of GM @Vanadium 50? In my opinion, his quote of @Nugatory's masterful remark was also quite masterful. :wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #210
strangerep said:
In fact, maybe posting a link to the original should be a mandatory requirement for new posts in this thread?
Isn't "In fact, maybe" rather fence-straddling? :wink: ##-## and might not such a mandatory requirement be rather stultifying? :oops: ##-## I think that whether to include a back-pointer link should continue to be left up to the person who posts the quote . . . :cool:
 
  • #211
sysprog said:
Hey, when I started the thread, I said "Sometimes I see a line (or maybe a brief multiline) post...
Fake news. Do you have a video?
 
  • #212
sysprog said:
Isn't "In fact, maybe" rather fence-straddling? :wink:
Ah, yes,... thank you. I'd been wondering what was causing that pain between my legs.
 
  • Haha
Likes Astronuc and sysprog
  • #213
Vanadium 50 said:
Post.
Now fixed.
I prefer the original. Come to think of it, there are plenty of posts here and elsewhere that are sorely inviting of an "oost". [Does anyone know whether an "oost" emoticon exists? And is/was there a corresponding internet meme?]

Vanadium 50 said:
There is a link to the original post, in the quote. Click the little arrow.
TIL how and when to use the "multiquote" button. :oldsmile:
 
  • #215
Mayhem said:
Quantum chemistry: When lonely physicists decided that their psychotic ideas should be my problem.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes Drakkith, Twigg, ChemAir and 5 others
  • #216
Vanadium 50 said:
Hey, don't "like" my post. I have my 8000. Go "like" the original by @Nugatory!
Didn't @Greg Bernhardt recently establish a new award for 12,000? Could you be resting on your laurels prematurely?
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #217
This one perhaps should go without saying, but @anorlunda said it so well:

"Just saying that you believe something without giving the foundation won't get you very far on PF."
 
  • #218
For you, the problem is that you aren't looking at the math. You're looking at various people's attempts to describe what the math is saying in ordinary language. And there is no way to do that with 100% accuracy because our ordinary language simply doesn't have the words or the concepts required. ##-## @PeterDonis (I added underlining)
 
  • #219
sysprog said:
For you, the problem is that you aren't looking at the math. You're looking at various people's attempts to describe what the math is saying in ordinary language. And there is no way to do that with 100% accuracy because our ordinary language simply doesn't have the words or the concepts required. ##-## @PeterDonis (I added underlining)
You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother - Einstein.

This is true. Ever since my dear grandmother passed I don't understand a thing.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PhDeezNutz, Drakkith, gentzen and 7 others
  • #221
. . . you can't just say "tachyons" and have a fully consistent theory appear out of nowhere. ##-## @Vanadium 50
 
  • #222
sysprog said:
. . . you can't just say "tachyons" and have a fully consistent theory appear out of nowhere. ##-## @Vanadium 50
I don't understand the fuss. I've measured them before with a tachyometer.
 
  • Haha
Likes DrClaude, bhobba, anorlunda and 1 other person
  • #223
Ivan Seeking said:
I don't understand the fuss. I've measured them before with a tachyometer.
Last time I was at the hardware store, all the velocimeters they had were bradyometers ##-## :confused:
 
  • #224
sysprog said:
Last time I was at the hardware store, all the velocimeters they had were bradyometers ##-## :confused:
Check Amazon
 
  • #225
Vanadium 50 said:
As they say "it is difficult to tell where one error ends and the next begins."
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes sysprog and anorlunda
  • #226
I'm sure it's not original. Probably comes from a referee report I got.
 
  • Haha
Likes Twigg, Keith_McClary, bhobba and 1 other person
  • #227
russ_watters said:
Heck, there's even a version you tell your 6 year old when he asks you at bedtime to explain what a black hole is. And it doesn't start with, "Well, son, for a static, spherically symmetrical spacetime..."
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Twigg, bhobba, sysprog and 2 others
  • #228
Vanadium 50 said:
Everything is better with explosive bolts.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Hornbein, bhobba, sysprog and 1 other person
  • #229
  • #230
You will learn much less by watching videos of people solving problems than you will solving problems. ##-## @Vanadium 50
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, Hamiltonian, PhDeezNutz and 4 others
  • #231
OP:

What I've gathered from reading your post is this: You are enamored of the grand concepts of physics, but you don't have the patience, discipline, and drive to work through the fundamentals. Physics is like many other fields: There's the fun stuff, and there's the not-so-fun stuff (what is fun and what is not-so-fun depends on the individual). But to succeed at the fun stuff, you also need to succeed at the not-so-fun stuff. That applies to geology and astronomy as well as to physics and math. So you should re-examine your attitude.

@CrysPhys

This definitely needs to be said to a lot of new posters. Not to berate them but rather give them an encouraging wake up call.
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian
  • #232
PeroK said:
The clocks and particles themselves are blissfully unaware of our choice of reference frame.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, BillTre, Keith_McClary and 3 others
  • #233
There comes a point where physics cannot be explained any further and you need to do the calculations for yourself. ##-## @PeroK
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, Keith_McClary, Hamiltonian and 1 other person
  • #234
Vanadium 50 said:
Timbo (was concerned that high energy particles found by the ANITA detector were a global threat)

'Am I the only one understanding this article?'

Vanadium 50

'I think you're the only one misunderstanding them.'
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, jack action, BillTre and 2 others
  • #235
When a newbie asked in the Feedback forum if they could post questions about homeopathy...

phinds said:
Homeopathic treatment should be payed for with homeopathic cash ... that is, an envelope that used to have money in it but now doesn't.

:smile:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes dlgoff, Drakkith, Astronuc and 15 others
  • #236
berkeman said:
When a newbie asked in the Feedback forum if they could post questions about homeopathy...
:smile:
Brilliant. I think that is in my top 5.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and phinds
  • #237
In a thread aksing if a transformer load current always returns to the transformer.

Dullard said:
If you can come up with a good way to persuade people who are simultaneously certain and wrong, I'd love to hear the details.
Wouldn't we all!
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith, bhobba and sysprog
  • #238
Not a 1-liner, but still a classic. From the Academic Advising forum... :smile:

BvU said:
(*) everyone wants to study only the essentials and everyone only wants to buy winning lottery tickets (especially management types ?:)). The only way to find out what is core is to study the lot. And the only way to make certain you buy the winning ticket is to buy all tickets...
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, pinball1970, sysprog and 3 others
  • #239
Too much honour ...
Must have been a weak moment ... :rolleyes:

##\ ##
 
  • #240
Motors require current to keep them running. Is that not obvious? ##-## @Dale
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith, hutchphd and Dale
  • #241
The book is free on Amazon and is seriously overpriced. ##-## @phinds
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes DaveE, Drakkith, jack action and 6 others
  • #242
This is a fun thread...
How come no one debited the hot air balloon thingy:
no one said:
A hot air balloon can jettison ballast to gain height, but it's still only a hot air balloon

Ah, I know :doh:! It 's not really a one liner, but a composite !
No more mischief :angel: -- merry xmas!

##\ ##
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes sysprog and pinball1970
  • #243
A post like this one, by a Mentor, happens regularly here on PF (I especially like the succinctness):
After a Mentor discussion, the thread will stay closed. Thank you everyone. ##-## @berkeman
 
  • Like
Likes BvU, Wrichik Basu, PhDeezNutz and 1 other person
  • #244
If the question happened to be "Find the solutions of the equation ##x^2 - 4x + 3 = 0##, and you wrote ##S = \{x | x^2 - 4x + 3 = 0 \}##, I doubt that many teachers would give you credit for this answer. ##-## @Mark44
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes valenumr, DrClaude, PhDeezNutz and 1 other person
  • #245
sysprog said:
If the question happened to be "Find the solutions of the equation ##x^2 - 4x + 3 = 0##, and you wrote ##S = \{x | x^2 - 4x + 3 = 0 \}##, I doubt that many teachers would give you credit for this answer. ##-## @Mark44
Ha ha!
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and berkeman
  • #246
We don't allow ill-formed thread starts here. Thank you. ##-## @berkeman
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #247
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes bhobba, Wrichik Basu, Keith_McClary and 7 others
  • #248
When the 5V capacitor explodes, scares you, and you try to get away, you don't want to trip and hit your head on the network analyzer cart. ##-## @DaveE
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre and berkeman
  • #249
You left off the last part...

DaveE said:
Network analyzers are expensive.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes bhobba, BillTre, Keith_McClary and 2 others
  • #250
And ever since the 13th amendment, you can't even buy us. Only rent.
 
  • Haha
Likes bhobba and DaveE
Back
Top