Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Members
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
712 replies · 68K views
hmmm27 said:
I haven't read The Hobbit either, though I imagine it's a comparitively easy read.
I was exposed to "The Hobbit" in year 9 high school English class. It was one of the prescribed literature textbooks, but our teacher refused to teach anything about it. She thought it was nonsense -- far beneath her. (Tbh, I didn't like her much at all. A literature teacher who doesn't comprehend the achievements of J.R.R. Tolkien?? Sheesh.)

"The Hobbit" is interesting in that the writing starts off with a rather childish tone -- well below year 9, I'd have thought. Not to mention the silly poems/songs.

Then the tone soon becomes more mature as the chapters advance.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hmmm27 and Borg
Physics news on Phys.org
I took a speed reading class and then was able to read War and Peace in twenty minutes.

It's about Russia.

That was Woody Allen.
 
I'm not sure if I'm allowed to self-report, but this is from a PM discussion with a couple members after they wasted a fair amount of time and effort trying to help a user in the EE forum who mainly seemed clueless about their AC Mains project they kept asking about, but turned out to have ulterior motives...

berkeman said:
Yeah, very sorry about that, what a waste of our time and effort. He was a help vampire and hacker hidden in clueless sheep's clothing. (That might be a record for mixing metaphors...) :smile:
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, Bystander and Vanadium 50
Hacker hidden in clueless sheep's clothing? Maybe he's just not the sharpest cookie in the jar.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
Vanadium 50 said:
Hacker hidden in clueless sheep's clothing? Maybe he's just not the sharpest cookie in the jar.
Doh! :smile:
 
Link limited to a select group !

1689181800082.png

1689181842828.png
 
Or...you can lead a gift horse to water but you can't look in his mouth.
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, BillTre and jbriggs444
I always thought the gifted horses were the ones stomping out answers to arithmetic questions...
 
gmax137 said:
I always thought the gifted horses were the ones stomping out answers to arithmetic questions...
They could also just be horses given to someone.
 
gmax137 said:
I always thought the gifted horses were the ones stomping out answers to arithmetic questions...
HorseGPT.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hmmm27
Vanadium 50 said:
HorseGPT.
ChatGPY and horses have one thing in common, at least: they both produce a lot of hotses.h...er...manure.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
HorseGPT.
That could be a winner. People like animals. Could CatGPT lie ahead?

I kind of like the idea of ChatLSD but that might get old fast. Then again, maybe not.
 
CatGPT would just ignore your questions.

Edit: This got me to thinking about Googling it and it turns out that CatGPT exists - https://cat-gpt.com
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: mathwonk, PeterDonis and dextercioby
jack action said:
We already have it in French. :-p
Well dang. I've had this happen before. Last time it was Apocalypso. Someday soon anything you can imagine will already be there. Then what?

A ChatLSD search turned up the Charles Schwab brokerage. Who knew?

There was a ChatLSD on Instagram that has been removed.
 
Last edited:
PeroK said:
This process of continually updating one's knowledge of a subject is called learning. It's the opposite of religiously adhering to an established view in the face of evidence to the contrary.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Flyboy, berkeman, Hornbein and 3 others
pbuk said:
... if only there were some way of searching for information on the internet :wink:
This deserves to be in this thread in its own right, yeah?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, phinds, BillTre and 1 other person
PeroK said
This process of continually updating one's knowledge of a subject is called learning. It's the opposite of religiously adhering to an established view in the face of evidence to the contrary.
I might borrow this one, if you don't mind.

-Dan
 
Swamp Thing said:
This deserves to be in this thread in its own right, yeah?
That was my complaint about the title "Breaking bad."
 
In a discussion about a woman who had 69 children from 27 pregnancies (all multiple births):
BillTre said:
27 x .75 = 20.25 years
That so much more reasonable.
Very fertile, but also efficient.
 
About questionable results in a new paper:

Vanadium 50 said:
At least it puts the woo in woo hoo.

:smile:
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G, BillTre and topsquark
When trying to help an EE student with analyzing fairly simple circuits, and they keep trying to use SPICE to guide their learning...

DaveE said:
You'll learn a lot more about electronics if you solve simple circuits with math before you simulate them. Simulations only give you answers, not reasons.
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Care
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu and BillTre
russ_watters said:
As a rule of thumb, when the first thing someone tells you is that their invention isn't a perpetual motion machine (before you can even think to ask), that means it's a perpetual motion machine.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, DennisN, Bystander and 5 others
That sounds like a conversation that could go on forever.
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and berkeman
gleem said:
There is no universal Least Action path to happiness.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, Vanadium 50, berkeman and 1 other person
This one is way over my head... :smile:

Vanadium 50 said:
The fact that you can buy an oven mitt at all is proof of quantum mechanics.
 
There is an explanation in that thread.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS