What do Greek symbols in math represent and how do you decipher them?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Newtons Apple
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symbols
AI Thread Summary
Greek symbols in mathematics, such as epsilon and sigma, can represent different concepts depending on the context, making it challenging to decipher their meanings without prior knowledge. While some symbols, like the "element of" symbol (∈), have standard meanings across all mathematical texts, others can vary significantly. Understanding these symbols typically requires experience and familiarity with various mathematical disciplines. The normal rules of algebra and order of operations generally still apply to complex equations, although exceptions may exist and should be clear from the context. Gaining experience through studying different texts is essential for mastering the interpretation of these symbols.
Newtons Apple
Messages
73
Reaction score
1
Ok... if there's one thing that really rustles my jimmies...is when I look at an equation an it's chock filled of greek letters, in a big swirl of greek alphabet soup...

I have a question, when you approach a new equation, do you automatically know what the symbols mean? Is it relative to the type of equation? I was looking at this, in regards to

1e89c1d262f761b2b40555faed1f4f98.png

and
67bbe052e5a971fd04c67524d94f054a.png


Are the two greek letters here, epsilon and sigma(?), always to refer to the same thing for every problem? How do you know then what they refer to? I see a lot of problems where they don't specify what the symbols mean? I look online and I get varying answers.

Is there a set way that one should "read" a statement like the one below? And more specifically what on Earth does epsilon stand for here, and how do you know?

92c126256beabc0e72f549ebbd555ea5.png
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Some Greek letters are standard, other differ in use. For example, ##\sigma## (=sigma) might stand for different things depending on the text. For example, in statistics texts, it might stand for the standard deviation. But in other texts, like group theory, it might be a function. It really depends.

The "epsilon" symbol is usually written as ##\epsilon## or ##\varepsilon##. The symbol you wrote above is ##\in## and it denote set membership. This is standard over all of mathematics. You won't meet a math text where ##\in## means something entirely different. You might meet texts where ##\sigma## or ##\varepsilon## is different though.

How do you know? Experience. If you study a lot of math texts, you will start to know such things. The ##\in## for set membership is usually taught in intro proofs books or set theory.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Okay... that actually helps. A lot. How do you pronouce(and type)..ehh that E character?
Is there anyway to tell which characters are constant and which can change depending on the context? Or do I just have to gain experience?

Lastly, when you have something like,
30e43f9eaa4a034ff846c50d471f14df.png


(yes I"m studying proofs...vainly attempting to study proofs)

Can you just look at it with no prior knowledge to what it is and know what is means? It seems like people can just post a formula or equation such as this.. with all sorts of greek letters and variables mixed in and they just know what it means...
 
Newtons Apple said:
Okay... that actually helps. A lot. How do you pronouce(and type)..ehh that E character?

"Element of" or "in".

Is there anyway to tell which characters are constant and which can change depending on the context? Or do I just have to gain experience?

It comes down to experience. But see this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mathematical_symbols

Lastly, when you have something like,
30e43f9eaa4a034ff846c50d471f14df.png


(yes I"m studying proofs...vainly attempting to study proofs)

Can you just look at it with no prior knowledge to what it is and know what is means? It seems like people can just post a formula or equation such as this.. with all sorts of greek letters and variables mixed in and they just know what it means...

No. Without previous knowledge, I have no idea what it's about. I might figure out some parts though. But certainly not the entire thing.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
micromass said:
No. Without previous knowledge, I have no idea what it's about. I might figure out some parts though. But certainly not the entire thing.


Ah, I see. Lastly, do the normal rules of algebra, order of operations, and simple algebraic rules even apply to these huge and more complex equations, or formulas?

And thanks for the list of math symbols!
 
Newtons Apple said:
Ah, I see. Lastly, do the normal rules of algebra, order of operations, and simple algebraic rules even apply to these huge and more complex equations, or formulas?

Yes, they should still apply. However, there might be some instances where they don't apply, but this should always be clear from context.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top