Greens function path integral representation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the path integral representation of the Green's function and the transition from the trace formula to this representation. The original poster references their book and an attached image for clarity. They acknowledge that explaining the transition in detail is complex and may not be suitable for a forum post. They suggest that their lecture notes on many-body quantum field theory could provide additional insights. The conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of the mathematical framework involved.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
In my book the path integral representation of the green's function is given as that on the attached picture. But how do you go from the usual trace formula for the Green's function 2.6 to this equation?
 

Attachments

  • greens.png
    greens.png
    11.4 KB · Views: 515
Physics news on Phys.org
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
904
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K