Green's function representation of electric potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the electric potential V in a region defined by the Laplace equation in the upper half z-plane, specifically for z ≥ 0. The user clarifies that the boundary condition involves the x-component of the electric field, leading to the conclusion that V can be equated to the function η. By applying Green's second formula, the user derives an integral representation for V using the Green's function for Laplace's equation in the half-space. The final solution incorporates the boundary condition, simplifying the problem. This approach effectively reduces the complexity of the original problem while adhering to the specified conditions.
hunt_mat
Homework Helper
Messages
1,798
Reaction score
33
Hi,

I have the following problem, I have an electric field (which no charge) which satisfies the usual Laplace equation:
<br /> \frac{\partial^{2}V}{\partial x^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2}V}{\partial y^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2}V}{\partial z^{2}}=0<br />
in the region \mathbb{R}^{2}\times [\eta ,\infty ]. So basically it is the upper half z-plane where the boundary is some fixed surface \eta, I also know that on this surface:
<br /> \frac{\partial V}{\partial x}=\frac{\partial\eta}{\partial x}<br />

I can do this in 2D by the use of the Hilbert transform. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me make sure I understand: this is a region for z &gt; \eta for some fixed \eta, or is \eta a function?
 
\eta is a function but with further thought the region could be set to z\geqslant 0 and I think that this will make the problem easier.
 
And if I read what you said correctly, you only know the value of the x-component of the electric field on this surface?
 
I think that you can also say that V=\eta due to other considerations too.
 
So I think I have solved this problem, I took V and \eta to be of the same size but small and reduced the complexity of the problem somewhat and the domain is now: \mathbb{R}^{2}\times [ 0,\infty ), using Green's second formula, I can write the solution as an integral over the boundary:
<br /> V(x,y,z)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}g\partial_{z}V-V\partial_{z}g\Big|_{z&#039;=0}d\Sigma<br />
Where g is the Green's function for Laplaces's equation for the half space given by:
<br /> g(x,y,x|x&#039;,y&#039;,z&#039;)=\frac{1}{4\pi\sqrt{(x-x&#039;)^{2}+(y-y&#039;)^{2}+(z-z&#039;)^{2}}}-\frac{1}{4\pi\sqrt{(x-x&#039;)^{2}+(y-y&#039;)^{2}+(z+z&#039;)^{2}}}<br />
Then using the boundary condition V=\eta, then the solution becomes:
<br /> u=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}u\frac{\partial g}{\partial z}d\Sigma<br />
 
Last edited:
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top