Grim Day on the Texas Power Grid

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the recent power outages in Texas and surrounding areas, examining the causes, impacts, and responses to the crisis. Participants explore various aspects of the power grid's failure, including policy, planning, and the implications of extreme weather conditions. The conversation touches on both technical and human elements of the situation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants compare the current situation to historical blackouts, suggesting systemic failures in policy and planning regarding power reserves.
  • Others highlight the human toll of the outages, particularly for vulnerable populations like children and the elderly.
  • There are mentions of the Southwest Power Pool's unprecedented Energy Emergency Alert levels and the potential for controlled interruptions of service to prevent larger outages.
  • Some participants speculate on the adequacy of reserves and the economic implications of maintaining excess capacity in power systems.
  • Concerns are raised about the impact of frozen wind turbines on power generation in Texas, alongside discussions of historical blackout frequencies in other states.
  • Participants share anecdotal evidence of varying outage durations and experiences across different regions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of viewpoints, with no clear consensus on the causes of the outages or the adequacy of the power grid's response. Multiple competing theories and concerns are presented, indicating ongoing uncertainty and debate.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include a lack of comprehensive data to diagnose the situation fully, as well as varying definitions of what constitutes "adequate" reserves. The discussion also reflects differing regional experiences and responses to the outages.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying energy policy, electrical engineering, and the impacts of extreme weather on infrastructure, as well as individuals affected by the outages seeking to understand the broader context.

  • #151
Fisherman199 said:
Power and associated utilities cannot be removed from political discussion.
For example, I worked at the NY ISO. In NY the federal regulator (FERC) set broad guidelines. Details of the markets (including whether or not to have a capacity market) were left up to the participants.

The details of micromanagement should never be embodied in statute law. Saying that, doesn't make things apolitical.

Also IMO, micromanagement of the ISO by the legislature is the direct cause of the 2000-2001 energy crisis in California. Not Enron, but the legislature.

By the way, the governor of New York State was livid with rage when he discovered that the state had zero authority to tell the ISO what to do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chemisttree
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #152
anorlunda said:
The details of micromanagement should never be embodied in statute law.
Very true and neither should they be under the control of Accountants and shareholders.Definitely the domain of the Engineer, IMO.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
28K