Guitar Strings & Tuning Forks: Investigating Beats

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of the time interval between consecutive maxima of sound intensity when a guitar string vibrating at multiples of 109 Hz interacts with a tuning fork at 440 Hz. The participants identify that the third harmonic (436 Hz) of the string is responsible for the beats observed. The time between consecutive maxima is determined to be half the inverse of the beat frequency, which is calculated as 1/|f1 - f2|. This leads to a clear understanding of the relationship between harmonic frequencies and beat intervals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic frequencies in string instruments
  • Knowledge of beat frequency concepts in wave physics
  • Familiarity with the mathematical representation of sound waves
  • Basic skills in calculating frequency differences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of harmonic frequencies in string instruments
  • Learn about beat frequency calculations in wave interference
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of sound wave interactions
  • Investigate the effects of different harmonics on sound quality
USEFUL FOR

Musicians, physics students, and educators interested in the acoustics of string instruments and the mathematical principles of sound wave interactions.

Granger
Messages
165
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


A guitar string with 0.60 m and 0.012 of mass vibrates with frequencies that are multiples of 109 Hz. Approaching to the string a tuning fork of 440 Hz we verify beats between the sound signals of the string and the tuning fork. Calculate the time interval between consecutive maximum of sound intensity. Identify the harmonic responsible for these beats.

Homework Equations


$$f=\abs{f_2-f_1}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't have any idea on how to determine the harmonic responsible for these beats. But without that there is no way I can determine the frequency and therefore I can not determine the period (time interval between to consecutive maximum).
There's something here that is escaping me, can someone clarify me please...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HEllo Granger,

Beats have to do with small differences in frequencies that cause a low-frequency amplitude envelope. So in your case you would expect something to happen with the third harmonic (436 Hz) of the string and the ground tone of the fork. See if you can write the sum of these two tones as a product as in the second link. And think carefully what the beat frequency value means for the time between consecutive maxima :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Granger
BvU said:
HEllo Granger,

Beats have to do with small differences in frequencies that cause a low-frequency amplitude envelope. So in your case you would expect something to happen with the third harmonic (436 Hz) of the string and the ground tone of the fork. See if you can write the sum of these two tones as a product as in the second link. And think carefully what the beat frequency value means for the time between consecutive maxima :smile:

Thanks! Oh ok I didn't understand the concept. It makes sense it's small frequencies. After calculation I concluded it's the 4th harmonic (436 Hz).
And I think I understand now. Because we have a product of cosines (so (-1)(-1)=1) we will have 2 maxima in a period (inverse of the beat frequency). Therefor the time between consecutive maxima is half the inverse of the beat frequency, right?
 
Last edited:
Granger said:
4th harmonic
sorry, my mistake (counted: ground tone - 1st - 2nd - 3rd instead of ground - 2nd - 3rd - 4th)

Nevertheless, I think you understand it quite well !
 
Granger said:
Thanks! Oh ok I didn't understand the concept. It makes sense it's small frequencies. After calculation I concluded it's the 4th harmonic (436 Hz).
And I think I understand now. Because we have a product of cosines (so (-1)(-1)=1) we will have 2 maxima in a period (inverse of the beat frequency). Therefor the time between consecutive maxima is half the inverse of the beat frequency, right?
Actually, the time between consecutive maxima is 1/|f1 - f2|. This is because a maximum occurs twice in each amlitude cycle which has a frequency of |f1 - f2|/2.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K