Gyro stabilized two-wheeled toy : Why the gimbal?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gyro
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of a gyro-stabilized two-wheeled toy, specifically examining the role of the gimbal in maintaining stability. Participants explore whether the toy would remain upright if the gimbal were removed and the gyro's rotation axis were fixed relative to the chassis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the toy would stay upright without the gimbal, suggesting that fixing the gyro's rotation axis could impact stability.
  • Another participant explains that the gimbal allows the gyroscope to resist tilting, and without it, the fixed platform would negate the gyroscopic stabilization, leading to instability.
  • A participant shares a personal experiment with a gyro, noting that bracing it eliminates the resistance to tilting, making it feel as if the gyro is not spinning.
  • Another participant expresses difficulty in visualizing the described mechanics and reflects on their past experiences with gyros.
  • One participant begins to understand the concept by considering the vector angular momentum and how additional constraints could lead to tipping.
  • A later reply reiterates the understanding of how bracing the gyro against a surface affects its lateral rotation, emphasizing the lack of resistance when constrained.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the mechanics involved, with some agreeing on the role of the gimbal while others are still grappling with the concepts. The discussion remains unresolved as participants explore different perspectives and experiences.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention personal experiences and experiments that may not fully capture the theoretical aspects of gyroscopic motion. The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of gyros under different constraints that are not universally agreed upon.

Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
798
Will this toy stay upright if we get rid of the gimbal and fix the gyro's rotation axis w.r.t. the chassis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way they have it, any tendency to tilt is resisted by the gyroscope, which freely rotates on the gimble. If you remove the gimble, a tendency of the board to tilt sideways creates a desire for the gyro to tilt forward or backward. That is then resisted by the fixed platform that the gyro is on and the resistance force makes the gyro want to tilt sideways. So the gyroscopic stabilization is defeated.

A simple experiment shows what happens. If you hold a gyro in your hands and try to tilt it, you feel the resistance to that tilt (initial tilt) and a desire of the gyro to tilt in another direction (secondary tilt). But if you brace the gyro so that it's desire for the secondary tilt is stopped, you will not feel any unusual resistance to your initial tilting. It would feel as though the gyro is not spinning at all.
 
Last edited:
FactChecker said:
But if you brace the gyro so that it's desire for the secondary tilt is stopped, you will not feel any unusual resistance to your initial tilting. It would feel as though the gyro is not spinning at all.

I'm finding it hard to visualize that, and I don't remember noticing it when I last played with a bicycle wheel gyro (which was a long time ago, admittedly).

I'll think about it a bit more and get back.

Thanks.
 
I'm beginning to get it -- I think -- based on adding the vector angular momentum that the new constraint would try to produce, on top of the original angular momentum of the spinning gyro. When we add the extra constraining torque, the resultant shows that the whole thing would tend to tip over.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and scottdave
This may help. Especially the demo at 3:09
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Swamp Thing and scottdave
Swamp Thing said:
I'm beginning to get it -- I think -- based on adding the vector angular momentum that the new constraint would try to produce, on top of the original angular momentum of the spinning gyro. When we add the extra constraining torque, the resultant shows that the whole thing would tend to tip over.
Yes. I have a gyro where the gimbal can be braced against a table to prevent any lateral turning. When I push it forward, the desire to rotate laterally is exactly opposed by a force from the table. It feels like it is not a rotating gyro at all -- just rotating forward with no unusual opposition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
24K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K