H|0> = 0? Does that mean that zero-point is ZERO?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LostConjugate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Zero
LostConjugate
Messages
850
Reaction score
3
In QFT after the Hamiltonian is normal ordered I guess when acting on the lowest energy state it annihilates it. So doesn't that mean the energy is zero now instead of 1/2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Essentially, what you are doing is measuring the energy in the field relative to the energy of the vacuum. It is exactly like changing the 0 point of your potential energy in introductory physics. The vacuum energy density is constant, so one can just measure relative to it to avoid the diverging integral that appears when you try to calculate the total energy in the field. What has really happened, behind the scenes, is a redefinition of the Hamiltonian:

H \rightarrow H - <0|H|0>
 
Well doesn't the infinity arise because your integrating over infinity. What happens when the next state is reached? Now your integrating a non-zero value over infinity again.

I thought the way of dealing with this was dividing the energy by the volume of the space in order to get the density. Essentially dividing infinity by infinity.
 
Try working out the zero point energy for the scalar field. You'll get:

<0|H|0>=V\int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega(k)

Even after you divide by the volume V, the energy of the vacuum still diverges because you are integrating \omega(k)=\sqrt{\vec{k}^2+m^2} over an infinite number of modes.

So you may be able to cancel out the infinity arising from the spatial integral, but not the one arising from the k-space integral.
 
G01 said:
Try working out the zero point energy for the scalar field. You'll get:

<0|H|0>=V\int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega(k)

Even after you divide by the volume V, the energy of the vacuum still diverges because you are integrating \omega(k)=\sqrt{\vec{k}^2+m^2} over an infinite number of modes.

So you may be able to cancel out the infinity arising from the spatial integral, but not the one arising from the k-space integral.

Ok so making the ground state 0 solves the problem. But what about the second state?
 
LostConjugate said:
Ok so making the ground state 0 solves the problem. But what about the second state?

You mean the 1 particle state?

The vacuum term is the same in the states with non zero particle number. Once you subtract it off the Hamiltonian once, you will get finite results for your non-zero particle states. For instance work out: <q|H'|q>=<q|H - H_o|q> where H_o is the groundstate energy defined above.

You will see that the ground state contribution cancels exactly with a term from <q|H|q>.
 
Last edited:
G01 said:
You mean the 1 particle state?

The vacuum term is the same in the states with non zero particle number. Once you subtract it off the Hamiltonian once, you will get finite results for your non-zero particle states. For instance work out: <q|H'|q>=<q|H - H_o|q> where H_o is the groundstate energy defined above.

You will see that the ground state contribution cancels exactly with a term from <q|H|q>.

Sorry for my poor math knowledge.

Is this correct?

H-H_o = \int \frac{d^4 k}{(2\pi)^4} k_p a_p^\dagger a_p

Which is still infinite? Is |q> the same as the scalar field integral evaluated at p=1?
 
LostConjugate said:
Sorry for my poor math knowledge.

Is this correct?

H-H_o = \int \frac{d^4 k}{(2\pi)^4} k_p a_p^\dagger a_pWhich is still infinite? Is |q> the same as the scalar field integral evaluated at p=1?

Your Hamiltonian will not change from the previous case. Simplified, it should look like:

H=\int d^3p \omega_p a^+_p a_p+H_o

(If you need a text reference check out Srednicki Chapter 3. )

Thus, H-H_o=\int d^3p \omega_p a^+_pa_p

Remember that |q>=a^+(q)|0>

So, you need to work out:

(H-H_o)|q>=(H-H_o)a^+_q|0>=\int d^3p \omega_p a^+_p a_p a^+_q|0>

Put the operators in the correct order and you should end up with a finite result.
 
Back
Top