MHB Hair Canada's question at Yahoo Answers (Constant series)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hair Series
AI Thread Summary
The series defined by a_n = c diverges unless c equals zero. For c greater than zero, the series diverges to positive infinity, while for c less than zero, it diverges to negative infinity. The mth partial sum is represented as S_m = mc, which leads to the conclusion that the series converges only when c equals zero. This indicates that the behavior of the series is directly tied to the value of c. Understanding this relationship is crucial for determining the convergence or divergence of the series.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

no matter what value I put for n, i keep getting c. So my best guess is that this is a diverging sequence?

Here is a link to the question:

Math: Is a_n = c diverging or converging? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Hair Canada,

The series is $\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}a_n=\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}c$. This means that the mth partial sum is $S_m=a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_m=mc$ so, $$S=\lim_{m\to \infty}S_m=\lim_{m\to +\infty}mc=\left \{ \begin{matrix}{ +\infty}&\mbox{ if }& c>0\\-\infty & \mbox{if}& c<0\\0 & \mbox{if}& c=0\end{matrix} \right.$$ As a consequence the series is convergent if and only if $c=0$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top