Halliday/Resnick vs. Young/Freedman (Also, Cramster?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter logicalghost
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around selecting a physics textbook for self-study, with two primary contenders: "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker, and "University Physics with Modern Physics" by Young and Freedman. Participants express that both texts have strong recommendations, leading to a dilemma in choosing between them. Some suggest acquiring both books to benefit from different explanations and problem sets. Concerns about internet reliability in rural areas lead to the decision against using MIT's online resources as the main guide, although it is noted that materials can be downloaded for offline use. Additionally, Cramster.com is mentioned as a potential resource for answers, with inquiries about the value of its paid accounts versus the free version. Participants recommend considering older editions of the textbooks for cost savings, emphasizing that the foundational concepts of classical physics remain unchanged over time.
logicalghost
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I posted here a while ago asking for recommendations for a physics textbook in order for my mother and I to teach ourselves physics - thank you so much for all your help! - and after much internet research and discussion, we've narrowed it down basically to either:

Fundamentals of Physics by David Halliday, Robert Resnick, Jearl Walker
OR
University Physics with Modern Physics by Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman

For every site/person I've found that recommends one, I find another recommending the other. I'd love to hear pros, cons, likes, and dislikes!

(Re: MIT online thing - I did look into it and it does look promising, but it was eventually vetoed as a main guide due to the fact that here in rural Kentucky the internet and cable can go down for days or weeks at a time.)

ALSO, we were looking at that site Cramster.com as a source of answers if we need more than just the book's own answer key. Has anyone here used it? It is worth signing up for? Is the free account enough, or is it really worth paying for whatever it is paid accounts get?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have 5 different 'standard' intro texts on my shelf- they are all the same. Same topics, same order of presentation, totally interchangeable.
 
I think the best thing is to just go with one, and stop stressing and losing time over which to choose.
 
You don't need continuous access for the MIT site -- most of their courses have a link that let's you download everything but the video lectures in one zip package, then you just unzip it on your PC. I would at least get it as a supplement.

As for the texts, why not get both? Then if you don't understand something in one, you may find that the other explains it better. And you may find that a very tough problem in one is a worked example in the other.

Instead of spending $200 on the latest edition of one or the other, go on Ebay or Amazon's used book store and get both for a combined total of 30 bucks or so, for editions ten or so years old. For somebody studying at home, there will be no difference at all between a book ten years old, and next year's edition. I have a copy of Halliday from 1975, and it would work just fine. You will be studying classical physics, which was pretty much set by 1900.
 
As far as MIT OCW goes, you can also download all of the videos off of iTunes U, so you don't need a constant internet connection at all!
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
Back
Top