Hamiltonian Path - Induction Proof

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the complete graph Kn has a Hamiltonian path for all natural numbers n >= 2, using mathematical induction. Additionally, participants explore how this proof can be adapted to demonstrate that Kn has a Hamiltonian cycle for n > 2.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the base case of K2 having a Hamiltonian path and the induction hypothesis that Kn has a Hamiltonian path. There is exploration of how to extend this to K(n+1) and the implications of Kn being a subgraph of K(n+1). Some participants express uncertainty about the proof structure and seek clarification on the inductive step.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering guidance on the induction process and questioning the clarity of the inductive step. There is acknowledgment of the simplicity of the problem, but some participants still express a need for further understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, focusing on the requirements of induction and the properties of complete graphs. There is an emphasis on ensuring that the proof is rigorous and addresses all necessary components.

brojesus111
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let G be a graph.
1. Let n be a natural number. Use induction to show for all n >= 2 Kn has a Hamiltonian path.
2. Explain how you could use the proof from #1 to show that for all n (natural number) n > 2 Kn has a Hamiltonian cycle.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So Kn refers to a complete graph - I know that much. And the n refers to the number of vertices. I'm not sure how to begin the proof for #1.

For #2, the subgraph excluding one vertex is Kn-1 has a path. We can connect the ends together through the excluded vertex to make a cycle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part 1, can you show that K2 has a a Hamilton path?
Then, by induction, suppose Kn has a Hamilton path. You know that Kn is a subgraph of K(n+1); so what then can you say about the existence of a Hamilton path in this subgraph? Show that this can be extended to a Hamilton path in K(n+1). In fact, this path can be extended in precisely two ways.
 
christoff said:
For part 1, can you show that K2 has a a Hamilton path?
Then, by induction, suppose Kn has a Hamilton path. You know that Kn is a subgraph of K(n+1); so what then can you say about the existence of a Hamilton path in this subgraph? Show that this can be extended to a Hamilton path in K(n+1). In fact, this path can be extended in precisely two ways.

So K2 has a Hamilton path is our base case, and that is obvious since it is just two vertices and we can easily visit each point once.
Our induction hypothesis is that we assume Kn has a Hamilton path.
For our inductive step, we want to show that this holds true for n+1. As you said, Kn is a subgraph of K(n+1). Since K(n+1) is a complete graph, then every vertex has a unique edge, so we can just travel along that edge to make that a Hamilton path since we assumed Kn has a Hamilton path.

I'm assuming I'm missing something here.
 
Last edited:
No, you aren't missing anything; it's just a very easy problem.
 
christoff said:
No, you aren't missing anything; it's just a very easy problem.

Oh, ok. Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K