Harmonic Distortion in a current waveform

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the total harmonic distortion (THD) in a current waveform using a specific formula. Participants explore the calculations involved, the interpretation of results, and the synthesis of the original waveform from its harmonics. The scope includes homework-related problem-solving and conceptual understanding of harmonic distortion.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a calculation for THD based on the values of the peaks in a graph, concluding with a THD of 97.2716% and seeks validation of their approach.
  • Another participant notes that there are different definitions of THD and suggests that the calculation aligns with the THD with respect to the fundamental frequency, which can exceed 100% if distortion is significant.
  • A participant expresses confusion regarding a follow-up question that asks to synthesize the original waveform from its principal harmonics and seeks clarification on how to combine waveforms.
  • Further clarification is provided on how to plot the original waveform and suggests methods for reconstructing it using sine waves corresponding to the fundamental and harmonics.
  • A participant shares their attempt at synthesizing the original waveform and questions whether their result aligns with the original task's intent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the method of calculating THD and the interpretation of the results, but there is uncertainty regarding the synthesis of the original waveform and the specific requirements of the follow-up question. The discussion remains unresolved on the clarity of the original task.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the understanding of how to accurately synthesize the original waveform from its harmonics, and the discussion reflects varying interpretations of the follow-up question.

David J
Gold Member
Messages
140
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


[/B]
Estimate the total harmonic distortion [THD] present in the current waveform using the formula:

Homework Equations


##THD\left(I\right)=\frac{1}{I1}\sqrt{\sum_{n=2}^\max\left(In\right)^2}\times 100\%##

The Attempt at a Solution


I have attached a worksheet for this. The work sheet has generated a graph. In the graph there are 3 peaks. The vertical axis is ##i^2## The first peak is showing the ##i^2## value of 15.87849655. The second peak is showing the ##i^2## value of 8.770681646 and the third peak is showing the ##i^2## value of 6.253185768.
The first peak is the fundamental. Peaks 2 and 3 are harmonics.

##I1=\sqrt{15.87849655}=3.984783##

##In=\sqrt{8.770681646+6.253185768}=3.876063391##

##THD\left(I\right)=\frac{1}{3.984783}\times 3.876063391\times 100\%##

##THD\left(I\right)=0.250954686\times 3.876063391\times 100\%##

##THD\left(I\right)=0.972716\times 100\%##

##THD\left(I\right)=97.2716\%##

I think this is correct but would appreciate any comments if I am wrong. I have attached the excel spread sheet to be read in conjunction with this question and answer.

Thanks again
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
David J said:

Homework Statement


[/B]
Estimate the total harmonic distortion [THD] present in the current waveform using the formula:

Homework Equations


##THD\left(I\right)=\frac{1}{I1}\sqrt{\sum_{n=2}^\max\left(In\right)^2}\times 100\%##

The Attempt at a Solution


I have attached a worksheet for this. The work sheet has generated a graph. In the graph there are 3 peaks. The vertical axis is ##i^2## The first peak is showing the ##i^2## value of 15.87849655. The second peak is showing the ##i^2## value of 8.770681646 and the third peak is showing the ##i^2## value of 6.253185768.
The first peak is the fundamental. Peaks 2 and 3 are harmonics.

##I1=\sqrt{15.87849655}=3.984783##

##In=\sqrt{8.770681646+6.253185768}=3.876063391##

##THD\left(I\right)=\frac{1}{3.984783}\times 3.876063391\times 100\%##

##THD\left(I\right)=0.250954686\times 3.876063391\times 100\%##

##THD\left(I\right)=0.972716\times 100\%##

##THD\left(I\right)=97.2716\%##

I think this is correct but would appreciate any comments if I am wrong. I have attached the excel spread sheet to be read in conjunction with this question and answer.

Thanks again
I didn't check it in detail, but it looks like you did it correctly. BTW, there are different kinds of THD, so I assume they asked for the THD with respect to the fundamental, which is the equation that you used. The THD with respect to the RMS sum of the currents cannot exceed 100%, but the THD with respect to the fundamental can if there is enough distortion.
 
Thanks for your input. I have attached the question FYI. It states to use this equation.

This was question (iii) of (iv) in a series. Question (iv) asks

"attempt to synthesise the shape of the original waveform from its principal harmonics [ eg sketch the waveforms of the harmonics on the same axis and add them together]

I think this is referring to the original wave form that was generated in the excel spread sheet I attached in post 1 of this thread. I am a little confused by this and was wondering if you could possibly help me understand the question a little better. What exactly is it asking me to do? How can I add 2 waveforms together ??
 

Attachments

  • Harmonics question.JPG
    Harmonics question.JPG
    35.3 KB · Views: 1,253
David J said:
"attempt to synthesise the shape of the original waveform from its principal harmonics [ eg sketch the waveforms of the harmonics on the same axis and add them together]
David J said:
I think this is referring to the original wave form that was generated in the excel spread sheet I attached in post 1 of this thread
Yeah, it sounds like it. If you just do a time domain plot of your B column versus your times in the A column, that will plot the original waveform.

You can try to reproduce that waveform by adding together the 3 sine waves (fundamental and harmonics) with the associated amplitudes from the Fourier plot and by adjusting their relative phases by hand. Or you could use the phase data from the Fourier analysis so you don't have to do the adjusting and adding by hand...
 
Hello again, well I had a go at this as you suggested and ended up with a somewhat different waveform which I am assuming to be the original. I attached the updated spreadsheet with this post. I tend to think this is correct. Do you think this is what the question was asking all along ??
 

Attachments

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
64K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
22K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K